Posts Tagged ‘Samsung Electronics’

Samsung Apple IP Battle Germany Continues

Saturday, February 4th, 2012
Samsung Apple IP Battle Germany Continues

By Don Southerton, Korealegal.org Editor

Wall Street Journal- Asia notes that the Samsung Apple IP battle in Germany continues to wage on…. Seems like both see Germany as vital in their  IP dispute.

SEOUL—Samsung Electronics Co. said Thursday that the Munich Regional Court has rejected Apple Inc.’s request to ban sales in Germany of the Korean company’s tablet computers and Nexus smartphones.

Apple filed the preliminary injunction request in November last year seeking to ban sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1N tablet and the Galaxy Nexus smartphone, saying that the electronics maker had infringed upon patents owned by the iPhone maker.

The decision comes after the Mannheim Regional Court in Germany ruled against Samsung last week, saying Apple hadn’t violated one of the Korean company’s technical patents as part of a broader patent dispute.

Samsung said it welcomes the latest ruling.

Apple Korea spokesman Steve Park reiterated the statement Apple has been making since the legal dispute began, saying the company will protect its intellectual property.

Source: LINK

 

 

Samsung Apple IP Battle Germany Continues

2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea-facing Commentary

Sunday, January 1st, 2012
2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea facing Commentary

By Don Southerton

Each new year, I share thoughts for the upcoming months in an executive-level commentary. Looking back at 2011, South Korea’s export economy saw a robust year—familiar names like Samsung, Hyundai, and Kia continuing to grow global market shares—demand driven by a mix of product quality, value, and design appeal, along with Japanese brands suffering set-backs from the devastation of the tsunami and threat of catastrophic nuclear meltdown.

Tempering the demand for top Korean cars, electronics, and consumer goods were deep concerns over the EU fiscal crisis—worries that still linger.

On a positive note following an amended agreement for the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) and ratification both by the U.S. Congress and Korean Assembly expectations are that the treaty will be implemented in the first quarter of 2012. Advocates and critics alike see the FTA boosting annual commerce between the two nations into the billions of Dollars.

Looking forward to 2012, first, the succession in North Korea will continue to be a concern. Issues include the stability of the Kim regime, threats of more border clashes, and an unchecked nuclear arms program. I’ll continue to monitor and share news as it unfolds.

Next, building on the momentum of the past 3 years, expect Korea’s export-driven firms to push their organizations to carve out greater global market shares. Look for even bolder announcements and sales targets than in the past. For example, Hyundai Motor Company, along with their sister firm Kia Motors, announced their global goals for 2012—targeting sales of seven million units. This is a significant increase from estimated sales of between 6.5 and 6.6 million the group expects for 2011.

Not to be outdone, Samsung Electronics, with record 2011 cell phone sales, intends to increase their total by as much as 15%. This translates to approximately 374 million phones, including 150 million smartphones for 2012.

One change from the past 2 years…., I expect few new foreign brands to enter the Korean market in 2012—part saturation, part concerns by the major Groups over the euro-zone fiscal crisis and a stalling U.S. economy undercutting global demand that in turn has an impact on the domestic economy. Two exceptions. One will be services benefitting from KORUS FTA such as U.S-based international law firms wishing to expand into Korea. The second are highly successful brands and products that bring with them strong appeal and a ready market—for example, Chipotle.

For those foreign businesses and brands that do plan to enter the Korean market or partner with Korean firms, I suggest they take efforts to understand not only the culture, but also business norms and expectations. For example, your key management needs access to coaching and someone to answer their questions on topics ranging from strategy to the impact of routine management changes within their Korean partner’s organization. It’s a small upfront investment and less costly than the consequences, which can include lawsuits, local and expat employee turnover, and months of missed goals and low productivity—not to mention tensions between you and the client over expectations. I know this area well—most recently handling the negotiations for a major brand launch in Korea.

Finally, expect further growth in Korean Green technology (wind power, solar, eCars, batteries), along with Korean overseas acquisition of energy related firms. With regard to Green, most of Korea’s major Groups have boldly entered the renewable and sustainable side of the market with plans to expand sales and distribution globally. This includes state of the art manufacturing facilities for wind turbines, solar cells, next generation batteries, and electric power trains.  In particular, Hyundai and Kia introduced hybrid models in 2011, with the group aiming to launch a variety of eco-friendly models in 2012.

To conclude, understanding the dynamics of Korea’s economy, markets, and major business groups is vital. It is critical to take into consideration Korea’s past and current trends. Culture, global influences, and a 24-hour virtual workday add to this complexity. I’m dedicated to providing much needed research, analysis, and critical thinking to provide you with answers and insights 24-7-365.

Please feel free to share this commentary across your organization and teams.

If needed, I can also provide more details on specific market sectors, etc.

Sponsored by KoreaPros

2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea facing Commentary

Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

Friday, September 23rd, 2011
Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Another dimension to the Samsung Apple slugfest is the upcoming release of the iPhone 5 in Korea as well as the rest of the world. Samsung appears to be pressuring the courts to stall the release in their home market. We’ll see…. Apple should discuss with me on how to approach culturally. For example (APPLE), I’d appeal to popular tech lust and let Koreans demand the product…..give me a call  1-310-866-3777 anytime.

Korea Times notes

Samsung Electronics is seeking a complete ban on the sales of the upcoming Apple iPhone 5 in Korea, in apparent retaliation to its U.S. rival’s continual patent suits against it in global markets.

Sources closely involved with the thorny issue including Samsung insiders made the comments Sunday as the two technology firms’ patent war is set to spread from Europe to the rest of the world.

At least 23 lawsuits are pending between Apple and Samsung in such countries as France, Japan, Germany, Korea and the United States and more are expected in an increasing number of states.

“Just after the arrival of the iPhone 5 here, Samsung plans to take Apple to court here for its violation of Samsung’s wireless technology related patents,’’ said a senior executive from Samsung Electronics, asking not to be identified.

“For as long as Apple does not drop mobile telecommunications functions, it would be impossible for it to sell its i-branded products without using our patents. We will stick to a strong stance against Apple during the lingering legal fights.’’

His remarks contrast Samsung’s hitherto approach of not entering into a dogfight with Apple even when the latter brought up patent issues with Samsung’s Galaxy brand smartphones and tablets.

The reason Samsung swallowed the image as copycats is Apple is one of the firm’s major clients as many of the U.S. behemoth’s i-products use its flash memories.

But Samsung showed signs of changing its strategy after Apple won an injunction from a German court against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 early last month so that Korea’s foremost company cannot sell the tablet PC in Germany.

To add insult to injury, it had to pull its latest tablet version of the Galaxy Tab 7.7, which has a smaller screen than the Tab 10.1, from its unveiling event during the IFA tech fair in Berlin this month.

Samsung responded by filing an appeal against the Germany ruling and a countersuit against Apple in Australia where the sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 have also been prohibited.

And the world’s second-largest handset maker is looking to make preemptive strikes by targeting the iPhone 5.

“We are taking different tactics since we are quite confident,’’ said another Samsung executive on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t allowed to speak publicly for Samsung.

“If Samsung wins in Germany that will give us a big breakthrough and so will other envisioned efforts against such products as the iPhone 5.’’

Samsung claimed that Apple’s iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPad 2 violate seven patents related to its wireless technology.

Targeting iPhone 5

The iPhone 5 has drawn interest even before officially hitting the market thanks to its attractive features and functionality.

It uses LG Display’s liquid crystal display (LCD), Samsung’s NAND flash memories and application processors (APs) and LG Innotek’s camera modules. It is also likely to have an 8-megapixel camera and an A5 dual-core processor.

Near-field communication (NFC), a feature to make it possible for the iPhone to be waved over a sensor for credit-card payments, will be added, officials said.

If Samsung manages to suspend the latest Apple handset it could affect SK Telecom and KT, the nation’s top two mobile carriers, authorized to sell iPhones.

KT spokesman Lee In-won said that KT will pay attention to the ongoing patent battles, while SK Telecom spokeswoman Kim Ji-won made no comment.

KT and SK Telecom have sold some 2.7 million and 400,000 iPhones in the local market, respectively. The iPhone 5 will make its debut here in the not-so-distant future through the two carriers.

Yet, there are chances that the standoff between Samsung and Apple may ease as the former is reluctant to make an enemy of the latter.

Such a mantra was well felt in statements by the Korean firm’s chief executive during a recent meeting with reporters.

“Apple is Samsung’s biggest customer. Hewlett-Packard (HP), Nokia and Sony were Samsung’s previous big clients, however, Apple is now a primary one. From our perspective, we are not entirely happy (about the litigations),’’ Samsung CEO Choi Gee-sung said.

 

 

Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

Samsung Clash with Apple Seen as Destiny

Friday, September 2nd, 2011
Samsung Clash with Apple Seen as Destiny

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

This fascinating article showed up in Korea Times.  It provides some additional dimensions to the Samsung–Apple relationship– and how Samsung sees the clash as part of its Destiny.


BERLIN – Samsung Electronics is in a transition game with Apple and regards the ongoing patent disputes with Apple as “destiny’’ before the next progress in corporate growth.

Samsung, South Korea-based tech giant, is aiming to become the world’s top-tier software firm by the end of 2013, at the earliest and its chief executive said it will heavily boost its spending on software.

“Samsung regards court battles with Apple as destiny. We are clashing with Apple in certain areas. Current situations will make us stronger,’’ said the company CEO Choi Gee-sung in a dinner meeting with Korean reporters, Friday.

“There had been heavy doubts about Samsung whether we can pass over Sony of Japan and even Nokia. But the results are telling everything,’’ said the top company executive.

Such remarks are very rare considering Samsung’s long tight-lipped policies about its key clients. Apple is Samsung’s biggest overseas client, followed by Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Sony.

Choi came to Berlin to participate in the IFA technology fair. 

The most critical 19 litigation cases between Samsung and Apple will get rolling in U.S. district courts in California.

Preliminary rulings there could affect Samsung’s ability to sell products in the United States _ Samsung’s biggest market.

Another senior Samsung executive, who participated in the meeting, simply ruled out the possibility that Samsung will come to a licensing deal with Apple, dismissing earlier predictions that the two companies will ultimately enter a comprehensive licensing deal.

“Samsung has no reason to send a `goodwill gesture’ to Apple first and therefore it is highly unlikely that Samsung will come to a licensing deal with Apple,’’ said Hong Chang-wan, the head of the company’s home appliances division.

Samsung apparently has no interests about the acquisition of HP’s webOS patent portfolios as it won’t follow any “cyclical fashion trend’’ just to respond to market changes.

“One thing clear is that Samsung will never buy HP’s webOS patent portfolios and I think that’s not important. We have over 20,000 software experts and Samsung prepares beyond normal imaginations. We are open to strike small M&A deals, though,’’ said the chief executive.

Samsung in recent weeks has taken pains to show that it understands the need to focus more on software to increase its margins.

Samsung’s public relations office leaked word that Chairman Lee Kun-hee told top executives last month, “We must pay attention to the fact that power is moving away from hardware companies such as Samsung to software companies.’’

And the chief executive Choi said, it will invest heavily to follow up with the trend, though the chief executive declined to elaborate further.

“Samsung is not an unorganized firm. In long-term evolution (LTE) service, which regarded as the next-generation telecom tech, Samsung will become the leader just within the next few years,’’ Choi told reporters.

Bullish sales target

Samsung plans to reap $150 billion in total revenue by the end of this year and the CEO Choi said the tech giant will continue a “double-digit growth pattern, annually.’’

Also, the South Korean firm is aiming to create $70 billion in total revenues only in Europe by the end of 2015 as it is more than positive for further external growths in Europe.

“Before coming to Berlin for the IFA exhibition, I visited Copenhagen of Denmark and Zurich in Switzerland, where we’ve been struggling. But even these markets, calls are high for Samsung’s premium-branded products,’’ Choi said.

“By the end of next year, the number of top-ranking items will be increased to 12 and we are aiming to get $23.7 billion in sales just from finished-goods business,’’ according to Choi.

Additionally, its home appliances chief Hong said Samsung is considering the possibility to build a new home appliances product line in Brazil and added Samsung will be safe in any litigation troubles with the market leader Electrolux of Sweden and Whirlpool of the United States.

Meanwhile, Samsung also plans to become the world’s third-biggest notebook manufacturer by the end of 2015.

“We are internally targeting to sell 40 million notebooks by 2015 and Samsung is also eyeing for printer sector dominated by Japanese companies,’’ said Nam Seoung-woo, who handles Samsung’s printer and notebook business.

Samsung Clash with Apple Seen as Destiny

Apple Samsung Battle in EU

Saturday, August 13th, 2011
Apple Samsung Battle in EU

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Another chapter in the Apple Samsung IP battle. This time in German courts. UK’s Guardian notes

German patent court grants Apple a preliminary injunction against Samsung’s Galaxy tablet over patent claim.

Apple Samsung Battle in EU

Apple’s iPad and Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1. Photograph: Jo Yong-Hak/Reuters

European customs officers have been ordered to seize shipments of Samsung‘s Galaxy Tab computers after Apple won a preliminary injunction against the Korean electronics giant in an acrimonious patent dispute.

Samsung on Wednesday said it would act immediately to lift the blockade, which prevents sales of its flagship tablet computer in the European Union, except the Netherlands.

Tens of thousands of Samsung Galaxy Tabs are thought to have been seized after the ruling late on Tuesday by a German patents court.

Apple has accused Samsung’s Galaxy range of smartphones and tablet computers of “slavishly” copying the design and functionality of its popular iPhone and iPad lines.

Apple will apply to have the injunction extended to the Netherlands before the patents court in the Hague later on Wednesday.

A Samsung spokeswoman said on Wednesday morning: “Samsung is disappointed with the court’s decision and we intend to act immediately to defend our intellectual property rights through the ongoing legal proceedings in Germany and will continue to actively defend these rights throughout the world.

“We will take all necessary measures to ensure Samsung’s innovative mobile communications devices are available to customers in Europe and around the world.

“This decision by the court in Germany in no way influences other legal proceedings filed with the courts in Europe and elsewhere.”

Apple alleges that the Samsung tablet infringes 10 separate patents in areas such as data transmission and wireless technology.

A spokesman for Apple said: “It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging. This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property when companies steal our ideas.”

Earlier in August the California-based company forced Samsung to delay the launch of its Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia after it won a preliminary injunction in that country. Apple, which overtook oil group Exxon as the world’s most valuable company on Tuesday night, is also seeking to block sales of the rival tablet computer in the US.

Samsung has countersued Apple in its native South Korea, as well as Japan, the US and Germany.

Florian Mueller, an intellectual property analyst who has followed the dispute between the two electronics giants, said that to win the EU injunction Apple must have convinced the Dusseldorf judge that it would be likely to win the main court proceedings.

“A preliminary injunction is ordered only if the court believes you’re likely to prevail in the main proceeding, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that you will,” he said. “In the event you lose the main proceeding, you’re liable for damages.”

Apple Samsung Battle in EU

Apple vs. Samsung Legal Battle Timeline

Saturday, August 6th, 2011
Apple vs. Samsung Legal Battle Timeline

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Time for an update on the Apple-Samsung IP battle. International Business Times provides a great timeline.

In one of the tech world’s biggest lawsuits, Apple Inc. has sued Samsung Electronics for copying the aesthetics of its iPad tablet and iPhone.

Both Samsung and Apple entered into a legal battle over patent infringement back in April. Samsung counter sued Apple in four countries on three different continents. There is no compromise in sight between the giants. The legal battle is likely to carry on, which could result in a loss of millions of dollars to settle each claim in the court.

Here is the timeline of the legal battle which began in April 2011.

April 15, 2011 – Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, Calif., files a patent suit against its Korean rival Samsung, claiming it had copied the “look and feel” of the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad for its Galaxy smartphones and tabs. Apple lays out a total of 16 claims covering software and hardware.

April 21 – Samsung files a lawsuit in the Seoul Central District Court, South Korea, against Apple citing five patent infringements. Samsung also filed a suit in a court in Tokyo, Japan citing two patent infringements, and in Mannheim, Germany citing three patent infringements.

April 28 – Besides suing Apple in three countries on two continents, Samsung also countersues Apple in the Northern District of California against Apple’s infringement of 10 patents.

June 22 – Samsung loses its bid. It earlier appealed to the federal judge in the U.S. to turn over samples of Apple’s iPads and iPhones in the future.

June 24 – In the ongoing battle, Apple issues rival Samsung with yet another new lawsuit in its home country, South Korea. Apple claims that Samsung has reproduced the look and feel on its Galaxy smartphones.

July 2 – Apple files a U.S. trade complaint seeking to block imports of Samsung’s Galaxy S mobile phone and Galaxy Tab computer.

July 5 – Apple seeks to ban U.S. imports of Samsung’s smartphones and tabs, through the U.S. International Trade Commission, a body known for its quick decisions.

July 9 – Apple and Samsung argue over the preliminary mandate. Apple wants it to be on Aug. 5, and later changes it to Sept. 8, since Judge Lucy Koh feels the August date is too early. Samsung suggests an earliest possible hearing date of Oct. 14, 2011.

July 12 – Samsung raises the issue of conflict of interest with regard to the treatment of privileged and confidential information gathered in the past. Therefore, Samsung asks the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to disqualify Apple’s outside lawyers from the litigation. Samsung looks forward to a court hearing on this, around Aug. 18, 2011.

August 2 – A U.S. trade panel responsible for patent disputes agrees to investigate Apple’s complaint that its intellectual property has been stolen by Samsung.

Apple vs. Samsung Legal Battle Timeline

Samsung Fights Back

Friday, July 1st, 2011
Samsung Fights Back

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

In my previous post, I shared how Apple continued to go after Samsung–taking the battle to the courts in Korea. Samsung has countered and file a complaint with the International Trade Commission.  My opinion is that much of this is but legal maneuvering designed to position each party best for a settlement. Neither could really expect bans on sale of their rival’s products.

I’d advise Apple’s lawyers to learn more about Samsung and their negotiation style and tactics… Apple leadership would benefit, too.  I can help with this.

SEOUL—Samsung Electronics Co.’s countersuits against Apple Inc.’s allegations of product copying have expanded to six countries, the company said Thursday, and now include a complaint with the International Trade Commission seeking to stop the sale of popular Apple products in the U.S.

The suits appear part of a broad strategy by Samsung to fight Apple’s lawsuit over the design of its smartphones and tablet computers with a barrage of litigation around the world.

By doing so, Samsung would build leverage that might force Apple to settle the initial case—which threatens to damage Samsung’s efforts to catch up to Apple in the smartphone and tablet markets, where profit margins are relatively high and market leadership is unsettled.

Samsung declined to answer questions about the strategy. A spokesman said the company doesn’t comment on pending legal matters. Apple declined to comment.

But the scope and ongoing expansion of the countersuits show the importance Samsung, the world’s largest technology manufacturer by revenue, has placed on countering Apple’s accusations that it copied Apple’s designs.

Apple is moving toward seeking a preliminary injunction in the initial case—filed in April in a federal court in San Jose, Calif.—that might limit Samsung’s ability to sell its smartphones and tablet PCs in the U.S., its biggest market.

With the latest filings earlier this week in Delaware and the Washington-based ITC, Samsung now has countersuits pending in California, South Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.

“To have lawsuits in many countries at the start, it’s the best way to protect their patents,” Jong Sang-jo, a law professor at Seoul National University, said of Samsung’s tactics.

Apple filed a follow-up suit against Samsung in South Korea last week. It alleged some of the same product-copying violations as in the U.S. case and accused Samsung of violating some of Apple’s technical patents.

The fight is one of many that have been filed over the past year over smartphone and tablet technology. But this one has gained greater attention because Apple and Samsung, while competing in consumer products, have a customer-supplier relationship in which Apple is the biggest buyer of Samsung’s device components, including chips and screens.

That has prompted speculation throughout the electronics industry that Apple might try to end its supplier relationship with Samsung. Such a move would prove costly to Samsung’s chip business, which has yielded the company’s highest profits for the past two years. It would also prove a challenge to Apple to find other suppliers that can provide parts at the volume and price that Samsung can.

Apple executives have said they expect the relationship to continue. A spokesman said Thursday that Samsung said it would fulfill its long-term contracts with Apple, adding: “We view the patent issue as entirely separate from our business relationship with Apple.”

Samsung chairman Lee Kun-hee in late April indirectly criticized Apple’s lawsuit as an attempt to restrain Samsung. “When a nail sticks out, [people] try to pound it down,” Mr. Lee told local reporters at the time.

Since Apple filed the first suit in late April, the legal approaches of the two companies have laid bare their different basic competencies and advantages in the marketplace.

Apple is asserting the primacy of its ability to design distinctive products, a skill that gives it the ability to charge premium prices and reap larger profit margins. By focusing on technology patents rather than design, Samsung is asserting that the development of components, related technologies and manufacturing prowess should be just as, or more, valuable.

In the market, Apple’s strategy has proved more profitable. It has been able to boost both its profit margins and its sales in recent years. Samsung, meanwhile, has had to contend with declining profit margins even as sales rose in its businesses.

For example, Samsung achieved a record profit last year, beating its previous record set in 2004, but it did so with smaller overall margins and a larger base of revenue, approximately twice the sales level it had in 2004.

Source: WSJ

 

Samsung Fights Back

Apple Files Patent Suit Against Samsung…in Korea.

Friday, June 24th, 2011
Apple Files Patent Suit Against Samsung...in Korea.

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor
Seems like the IP lawsuits between rivals Apple and Samsung continues to escalate. I see this as partly posturing, since Samsung provides so much technology for Macs, iPads, and iPhones.

Bloomberg News
Apple Inc. (AAPL) filed a patent lawsuit against Samsung Electronics Co. in South Korea, escalating the legal dispute between the two companies regarding designs and technologies used in their best-selling mobile devices.

The maker of the iPhone filed a suit with the Seoul Central District Court on June 22, according to a case record on the court’s website, which doesn’t provide details of Apple’s claims. Online news provider MoneyToday reported that Apple is alleging that Samsung’s Galaxy S smartphone copied the iPhone 3 design.

The dispute began in April when Cupertino, California-based Apple sued Samsung in the U.S., claiming the Galaxy products “slavishly” imitated the designs and technologies used for the iPad and iPhone. Samsung, which supplies memory chips for Apple, retaliated with lawsuits in Seoul, Tokyo, Mannheim, Germany and the U.S.

“We will continue to actively defend and protect our intellectual property,” Suwon, South Korea-based Samsung said in an e-mailed statement.

When contacted by Bloomberg News today, Steve Park, a Seoul-based spokesman for Apple, referred to the company’s earlier statements. The company said on April 18 that Samsung “blatantly” copied its technologies and designs.

Apple’s April 15 complaint claims Samsung is infringing seven patents related to the way Galaxy devices’ touch screens understand user gestures, including selecting, scrolling, pinching and zooming. Samsung is also copying three patents on the design, including the flat black face of the iPhone and iPad, according to Apple.

As part of that suit, Samsung had asked a federal judge in the U.S. to order Apple to turn over samples of Apple’s forthcoming iPads and iPhones. It lost that bid on June

Apple Files Patent Suit Against Samsung...in Korea.

An Upside for Korean Global Business? Another Side of the North South Tensions

Sunday, May 30th, 2010
An Upside for Korean Global Business? Another Side of the North South Tensions

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Over the past week, I’ve been sharing my thoughts on the recent heightened tensions between North and South Korea over the sinking of the Cheonan naval vessel.

After a lengthy investigation following the March incident, a multinational forensics team concluded unanimously it was a North Korean torpedo that sank the South Korean ship.

Why did North Korea launch such an attack knowing it would anger even those sympathetic to their plight? In correspondence, Marcus Noland, noted NK scholar, shared his thoughts on North Korean motivations. They include:

1) Revenge (for an earlier encounter where the North took a bruising from the South’s better equipped navy).

2) Brinkmanship

3) Wave the bloody shirt—divert attention inside the North from disastrous confiscatory currency reform.

4) Influence South Korean National Assembly elections–the current president Lee Myung-bak administration’s takes a hard line approach to the North and opposition leaders have long supporting a more conciliatory path.

5) Succession—Kim Jong Il’s son and his peers might get credit for the attack and it would be a show of strength to defy the South and their allies.

That said, tension and emotions are running high. In fact, more so than in years. June elections, pro-North supporters, anti-North war veteran groups, and the media continue to fan the situation.

Without ignoring or downplaying the human suffering and loss resulting from the Cheonan sinking… So, why might this benefit Korean global business? Samsung, Hyundai-Kia Motors and LG derive much of their profits from international sales. Even with the global recession last year, they all performed well—lots due to a weak Won. This year the Won was strengthening against the Dollar as the South Korea economy recovered. This could mean that overseas profits this year would in turn suffer.

Interestingly, the Korea Economic Institute notes that when a threat arises from the North the Won drops in value to the Dollar. (Please review the full article posted by the Korea Economic Institute.) Click Here

So what may foster fear and concern among many working for Korea-based global organizations, the current tensions might actually have some benefit– at least in short term profits.

So what can we expect…. Over the next few weeks, we’ll see defensive positioning of the South Korean and US military forces, more sanctions against the North, China and Russia trying to avoid taking sides, and the North grabbing as much media attention as it can.

Questions? Comments?

An Upside for Korean Global Business? Another Side of the North South Tensions

Samsung Slander Suit Against Journalist Resolved

Monday, May 17th, 2010
Samsung Slander Suit Against Journalist Resolved

Perhaps one of the most interesting lawsuits coming out of South Korea seems to have been resolved. It involved Samsung and journalist Michael Breen. I no huge fan of  Mr. Breen. He tends to be somewhat cynical in his coverage of Korean big business. His attack on Samsung is no surprise. What surprised many was that Samsung took him to court.

Some of the details pulled together nicely by the LA Times

Headlined “What People Got for Christmas,” the English-language column [in Korea Times] also poked fun at global technology giant Samsung Electronics, referring to past bribery scandals as well as perceptions that its leaders are arrogant.

The piece was meant as a satirical spoof, the columnist says, but Samsung wasn’t laughing.

Breen’s column ran as local media reported that President Lee would soon pardon Samsung Chairman Lee Kun-hee on a 2008 conviction for tax evasion. Chairman Lee, 68, had already received a federal pardon in the 1990s on a conviction for bribing two former presidents while he was with the firm.

On Dec. 29, the day of Lee’s pardon, Samsung sued the freelance columnist, the newspaper and its top editor for $1 million, claiming damage to its reputation and potential earnings. After the Korea Times ran clarifications, the newspaper and its editor were dropped from the suit.

But Samsung continues to pursue Breen personally for libel, both civilly and on criminal charges that he intentionally libeled the company. If convicted, he faces a hefty fine and even jail time.

“The reason I’m being sued is that the beast roared,” said Breen, 57, a British native and longtime social commentator and South Korean resident who wrote a 1998 book on South Korea’s modern history.

In its suit, Samsung said the column used a “mocking tone” to add “baseless, malicious and offensive false information to criticize” the firm.

After Samsung complained, the paper ran two clarifications, one of which Breen says he was told by editors was written by Samsung.

[note to readers of the KoreaLegal.org]
Legal experts here say the case underscores the considerable power wielded in South Korean society by such mammoth corporate conglomerates, known as chaebols, which are dominated by top officials, often related, who are treated here as near-royalty.


Samsung Slander Suit Against Journalist Resolved