Posts Tagged ‘KORUS FTA’

KORUS FTA–What’s the delay?

Saturday, February 11th, 2012
KORUS FTA  Whats the delay?

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

This past week we saw the current Korean administration’s opposition seeking to “axe” KORUS FTA. In response supporters seek to get the FTA enacted ASAP. As reported in Yonhap News Agency, “We believe that the U.S.-Korea free trade agreement is in the interest of the United States, of the Republic of Korea, and of the relationship between our two countries,” A State Department official further noted. “The U.S.-Korea free trade agreement represents a historic opportunity to increase exports, support job creation, bolster both our economies, and strengthen a vital strategic alliance in the Asia-Pacific.”

So what’s the delay? Here’s my update…

On a positive note following the 2011 amended agreement for the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) and ratification both by the U.S. Congress and Korean Assembly expectations are that the treaty will be implemented in the first quarter of 2012. Advocates and many critics alike see the FTA boosting annual commerce between the two nations into the billions of Dollars.

That said, although the treaty has been signed, both the U.S and South Korean government require a final legal review, then a period of public review and discussion prior to implementation.

More specifically,

1. The original plan was for KORUS FTA to take effect on January 1, 2012.

2. However, end-of-year holiday time restraints slowed U.S. government legal review of the final KORUS FTA wording and translation. This has resulted in a January implementation delay.

3. Once this U.S. review has been finalized (probably in February), the agreement documents will be reviewed by Korea. Then, as in the terms of the agreement the KORUS FTA must take effect within 60 days of finalized documents.

4. The 60-day period also serves as a public review of the treaty by citizens from both countries.

5. According to my sources, we can expect KORUS FTA to take full effect in March or early April.

To conclude, the final review process can be time consuming. For example, even though the treaty is signed, U.S. legal review teams have asked for additional documents and clarifications regarding the FTA wording and translations. Once the Korean teams respond to the U.S. side’s questions, the documents will be then sent to Korea for their final review. The Korean team then may have questions for the U.S. team, who in turn will need to reply, and so forth.

Look for updated as the unfold.

KORUS FTA  Whats the delay?

2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea-facing Commentary

Sunday, January 1st, 2012
2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea facing Commentary

By Don Southerton

Each new year, I share thoughts for the upcoming months in an executive-level commentary. Looking back at 2011, South Korea’s export economy saw a robust year—familiar names like Samsung, Hyundai, and Kia continuing to grow global market shares—demand driven by a mix of product quality, value, and design appeal, along with Japanese brands suffering set-backs from the devastation of the tsunami and threat of catastrophic nuclear meltdown.

Tempering the demand for top Korean cars, electronics, and consumer goods were deep concerns over the EU fiscal crisis—worries that still linger.

On a positive note following an amended agreement for the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) and ratification both by the U.S. Congress and Korean Assembly expectations are that the treaty will be implemented in the first quarter of 2012. Advocates and critics alike see the FTA boosting annual commerce between the two nations into the billions of Dollars.

Looking forward to 2012, first, the succession in North Korea will continue to be a concern. Issues include the stability of the Kim regime, threats of more border clashes, and an unchecked nuclear arms program. I’ll continue to monitor and share news as it unfolds.

Next, building on the momentum of the past 3 years, expect Korea’s export-driven firms to push their organizations to carve out greater global market shares. Look for even bolder announcements and sales targets than in the past. For example, Hyundai Motor Company, along with their sister firm Kia Motors, announced their global goals for 2012—targeting sales of seven million units. This is a significant increase from estimated sales of between 6.5 and 6.6 million the group expects for 2011.

Not to be outdone, Samsung Electronics, with record 2011 cell phone sales, intends to increase their total by as much as 15%. This translates to approximately 374 million phones, including 150 million smartphones for 2012.

One change from the past 2 years…., I expect few new foreign brands to enter the Korean market in 2012—part saturation, part concerns by the major Groups over the euro-zone fiscal crisis and a stalling U.S. economy undercutting global demand that in turn has an impact on the domestic economy. Two exceptions. One will be services benefitting from KORUS FTA such as U.S-based international law firms wishing to expand into Korea. The second are highly successful brands and products that bring with them strong appeal and a ready market—for example, Chipotle.

For those foreign businesses and brands that do plan to enter the Korean market or partner with Korean firms, I suggest they take efforts to understand not only the culture, but also business norms and expectations. For example, your key management needs access to coaching and someone to answer their questions on topics ranging from strategy to the impact of routine management changes within their Korean partner’s organization. It’s a small upfront investment and less costly than the consequences, which can include lawsuits, local and expat employee turnover, and months of missed goals and low productivity—not to mention tensions between you and the client over expectations. I know this area well—most recently handling the negotiations for a major brand launch in Korea.

Finally, expect further growth in Korean Green technology (wind power, solar, eCars, batteries), along with Korean overseas acquisition of energy related firms. With regard to Green, most of Korea’s major Groups have boldly entered the renewable and sustainable side of the market with plans to expand sales and distribution globally. This includes state of the art manufacturing facilities for wind turbines, solar cells, next generation batteries, and electric power trains.  In particular, Hyundai and Kia introduced hybrid models in 2011, with the group aiming to launch a variety of eco-friendly models in 2012.

To conclude, understanding the dynamics of Korea’s economy, markets, and major business groups is vital. It is critical to take into consideration Korea’s past and current trends. Culture, global influences, and a 24-hour virtual workday add to this complexity. I’m dedicated to providing much needed research, analysis, and critical thinking to provide you with answers and insights 24-7-365.

Please feel free to share this commentary across your organization and teams.

If needed, I can also provide more details on specific market sectors, etc.

Sponsored by KoreaPros

2012 Trends and Expectations—A Korea facing Commentary

CNBC Coverage of KORUS FTA

Saturday, December 3rd, 2011
CNBC Coverage of KORUS FTA

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

With South Korea president Lee Myung-bak signing the KORUS FTA, we see the major trade agreement taking effect in January 2012.

Long a topic of KoreaLegal.org, we were pleased to hear Sean King, Senior VP of Park Strategies, CNBC’s comments on KORUS FTA.

Loved Sean’s comments and observations on Korean cars.  GM Korea (formerly GM Daewoo) Chevy ribbon badging was a smart move….Old gray GM Daewoo showrooms are now Chevy Town…. colors bright…. etc. Might have something to do with 2 former heads of Hyundai Motor America marketing now running GM and Chevy marketing globally.

See http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000059540

 

CNBC Coverage of KORUS FTA

KORUS FTA and Twitter

Saturday, November 5th, 2011
KORUS FTA and Twitter

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Several years ago as ROK President entered the early months of his administration the opposition using social media (Text) orchestrated huge protests. Lots of this centered on American beef and Mad Cow disease.

Looks like the opposition party has resorted to similar tactics ( Twitter) to force the GNP in final KORUS FTA talks…

Korea Times notes:

Unfounded and absurd rumors about the ill effects of the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement (KORUS FTA) are spreading rapidly through social networking services (SNS).One rumor argues that the FTA will wipe out Korean rice farmers and Korea will fall victim to big grain producers, although the rice market has already been opened in accordance with the multilateral agreement made under the supervision of the World Trade Organization.

Another claims that the FTA will push mad cow disease to immediate epidemic proportions; while firearm controls will be lifted, turning Korean streets into scenes of gun battles.

There appear to be a couple of different twists to the “mad cow protests” over Seoul’s decision to resume American beef imports that peaked with candlelit protests two and a half years ago. One of them is the medium. It was then Internet blogs but now SNSs such as Twitters are taking over.

But there are common threads pushing the two rumor machines ― a high level of discontent among young people, hit by dark prospects of unemployment, and deep distrust of the incumbent government.

The rumor mills are expected to go on at full tilt during the deadlock over the ratification of the KORUS FTA in the National Assembly.

At the center of the rumor is the investor-state dispute (ISD) clause as part of the FTA, which would allow foreign investors to bring suits against the government of the co-signatory before an international panel of arbitrators.

Protestors demanded that the ISD be removed from the accord, arguing the provision would limit Seoul’s policies on American investors.

The increasing argument on the ISD is churning out wild rumors.

According to the messages on the KORUS FTA circulating on the Internet and SNS, Koreans will suffer from expensive medical bills, caused by privatization of medical services. Protests say, for example, patients will have to pay 9 million won for an appendectomy, up from currently 300,000 won, after the FTA takes effect.

In addition, they say that the FTA deal will raise public utility charges, as Bolivia faced after the FTA with the United States.

However, both rumors turned out to be false, as the medical sector is not included in the FTA, while Bolivia did not reach an agreement with the United States, according to the government.

The rumor-spreading campaign has reached political parties.

The Democratic Labor Party came up with 12 poisonous articles on the FTA, while an opposition lawmaker cited the message that 15 Mexican delegates of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) were shot to death after the nation’s economic downfall following the FTA.

The escalating rumors come as the Lee administration has failed to regain popularity.

In the Seoul mayoral election last month, opposition-backed civic activist Park Won-soon won with 53.3 percent of the vote compared to his Grand National Party rival Na Kyung-won’s 46.3 percent.

President Lee Myung-bak is rapidly becoming a lame duck ahead of his final year in office as a series of corruption scandals involving presidential aides has erupted.

 

KORUS FTA and Twitter

KORUS FTA–Opportunity and Challenges

Thursday, October 13th, 2011
KORUS FTA  Opportunity and Challenges

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

We’re thrilled with the US Congressional approval of the KORUS FTA. Still some hurtles, but we assume the treaty will be enacted soon.

Meanwhile many are looking to Korea for opportunity, as others in Korea will look to America to benefit from the agreement.

We can help. In fact, with KORUS FTA … learn how to best approach Korea-facing business. Unique case study “sneak peek” now available. Just ask us for the Private Link.  Dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com

KORUS FTA  Opportunity and Challenges

Doing Business in Korea–A Recap

Friday, July 22nd, 2011
Doing Business in Korea  A Recap

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org

On Wednesday July 20, 2011 the World Trade Center San Diego hosted an Asia Desk: Korea workshop.

The event centered on opportunities that Korea offered American businesses. I was honored to join KOTRA Trade Commissioner and Director General Won-Sok Yun. Together we shared “why Korea” offered US businesses and especially those in San Diego growth potential. KOTRA provides a number of resources for those doing business in Korea, including resolving disputes.

Doing Business in Korea  A Recap
Director General Won-Sok Yun
Doing Business in Korea  A Recap
Participants represented a wide range of business sectors

For details on the presentation, the WTCSD will be posting a link with the PPTs. ( Check their site).  For more information on doing business in Korea, please contact–Dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com

Doing Business in Korea  A Recap

Time for a KORUS FTA Update

Friday, July 15th, 2011
Time for a KORUS FTA Update

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Mid summer and the anticipated  early July target for signing the KORUS FTA has come and gone.  That said, it’s time for an update on both South Korea’s Assembly and the US Congress’ review of the treaty.

South Korea Update:  Senior lawmakers of the ruling party reiterated Monday that they would push for the ratification of the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement (KORUS FTA) during the August session of the National Assembly. 
“We are aiming to pass the FTA bill by the end of next month,” Rep. Hwang Woo-yeo, floor leader of the Grand National Party (GNP), said.

The four-term lawmaker dispelled growing concerns that the conservative party may use its majority status to ram through the contentious bill without proper deliberations with the opposition. 

The GNP, which controls 169 seats in the 299-member unicameral legislature, has unilaterally endorsed a number of major bills after physical clashes with rival parties, including budget proposals and an FTA with the European Union. 

When asked what his party would do if opposition parties forcibly block the passage of the trade pact, Hwang replied that his party will likely stick with the democratic process while it also remains pending in the U.S. Congress. 

“So long as Washington does not ram the trade deal through the Congress, the GNP will handle the matter through dialogue and negotiations with opposition parties,” he said. 

GNP spokeswoman Rep. Bae Eun-hee also noted that the GNP reaffirmed its position that it will push for the passage of the KORUS FTA at a joint workshop of the party’s Supreme Council and policy committee on Sunday. 

Last Wednesday, Hwang and the GNP’s new Chairman Hong Joon-pyo expressed their support for a prompt ratification of the much-delayed trade deal at a meeting with presidential chief of staff Yim Tae-hee. 

The FTA was signed in 2007, but the government’s move to get the bill ratified has been blocked partly because of strong objections from the main opposition Democratic Party (DP) and the country’s farming industry.

However, Chairman Hong, who is known as a strong advocator of the FTA, hinted that the GNP may have to risk a physical showdown with rival parties, suggesting a division within the ruling block. 

Hong reportedly said the GNP has no reason to hesitate in using its majority status to approve the bill as recent polls show some 65 percent of the public support the deal. 

Business experts forecast that once implemented, the KORUS FTA may increase the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) by 6 percent over the next decade. 

They claim that the bilateral deal could create as many as 34,000 jobs a year.

The fate of the deal, however, remains uncertain as the DP insists on renegotiations with Washington. 

Meanwhile, the GNP has announced that it will push the passage of a bill that calls for stricter aid distribution monitoring in North Korea and financial aid to non-governmental organizations that keep records of human rights abuses in the communist country.

Source: Korea Times

U.S. Update: President Barack Obama will soon send a free trade pact with South Korea to Congress for approval despite Republican threats to vote against it because of a retraining program for workers displaced by trade, White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley said on Thursday.

“There is no time to waste fighting politics as usual,” Daley said in a speech at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the U.S.-Korea Business Council. “If we do not act before the August recess, American business will suffer.”

Obama faces a showdown with Republicans over his insistence that an extension of the nearly 50-year-old Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) retraining program be passed along with the Korea pact and two other pending free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama.

Republicans have objected to Obama’s plan to insert the TAA program into the implementing bill for the South Korea agreement, insisting that lawmakers be allowed to vote separately on the TAA and the trade pact.

The White House believes both could pass separately.

However, Daley said Republicans have yet to offer a “credible” plan that would prevent TAA opponents from blocking a vote on the program, which Democrats see as a vital safety net and many Republicans view as ineffective.

“We can no longer wait. If there’s no agreement on an alternative approach in the very near future, we will move forward to seek passage of the FTA (Free Trade Agreement) with TAA” included, Daley told the audience of U.S. and Korean business officials.

Daley said the White House expects the Korea agreement “to create or support 70,000 American jobs” through tariff cuts that will open the South Korean market to more U.S. exports.

Congress must act soon because a rival deal struck by the European Union with South Korea went into force on July 1, threatening U.S. market share in the longtime ally, he said.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has said he would vote against the Korean agreement if TAA is included in the implementing legislation for the deal.

AMERICAN JOBS ON THE LINE

But most business leaders recognize an extension of TAA has to be part of the mix, and don’t believe it is worth holding the agreement up over the issue.

“We can’t let differences over processes and procedures hold back these agreements any longer. American jobs and American standing in the world are on the line,” said U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue.

The deal was originally negotiated during the administration of former President George W. Bush and business groups have been waiting four years for it to become law.

“We’ve seen first hand what these free trade agreements do after implementation,” said Mike Ducker, chief operating officer of FedEx Express, a division of FedEx.

“Not only does it create new commercial opportunities for our customers and greater demand for our services, it allows us to continue growing our operations and our work force around the world,” Ducker told Reuters in an interview.

Critics, including the AFL-CIO labor federation and Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, say tradedeals endanger U.S. jobs by cutting U.S. tariffs and encouraging companies to move their operations overseas.

A study by the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute says the Korean trade agreement could displace about 159,000 American jobs over seven years.

But Harrison Cook, vice president of international government affairs for Eli Lilly and Company, said the rival EU-South Korea agreement puts U.S. pharmaceutical companies at a disadvantage in a major market.

“All those tariff preferences are going to go to our Europeans competitors, not to us. That’s a significant consideration in this sector, where you do long-term contracting,” Cook told Reuters in an interview.

Source: Reuters

Time for a KORUS FTA Update

Southerton Summer Update–Globalization

Saturday, July 9th, 2011
Southerton Summer Update  Globalization

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

Just a short summer update.

Over the past months, FTA, Samsung–Apple, Google, Lone Star KEB, FDI, franchise law, and international job recruitment have been the dominated Korea-facing legal issues. That said, there are local Korean cases that warrant attention, but my focus tends to be global. In fact, most of the articles I provide commentary illustrate the globalization of Korean business. I see this daily in my work–with Korean global firms overseas’ operations, with global firms entering the Korean market, or with global brands looking to provide services to Korean-facing firms.

This trend will continue. In turn it is inevitable that more legal issues and lawsuits will surface.

Southerton Summer Update  Globalization

KORUS FTA Stalled, Again?

Saturday, May 28th, 2011
KORUS FTA Stalled, Again?

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Readers of KoreaLegal.org might be wondering what’s stalling the long in coming KORUS FTA. The free trade agreement between Korea and the U.S. seems stalled, again. Hopes were it would be approved before Congress’ July recess. Plans also called for the KORUS FTA not being tied to other pending FTAs. Both efforts appear to have failed.

WSJ notes:

WASHINGTON—The centerpiece of the American trade agenda—a trio of international trade pacts worth $13 billion in new U.S. exports—is in peril as Democrats and Republicans battle over a program that provides aid to U.S. workers.

The dispute over the future of the 50-year-old Trade Adjustment Assistance program, which provides benefits to American workers displaced by foreign competition, is putting pending free-trade pacts with South Korea, Colombia and Panama in jeopardy by pulling them into the contentious debate over federal spending.

The Obama administration and Democrats in Congress want the TAA program renewed. Some Republicans question its value and say it should be scaled back to narrow the deficit.

The delay caused by the congressional sparring means it is now virtually impossible to pass the South Korea agreement before a trade pact between Korea and the European Union takes effect July 1. That will put a wide range of U.S. industries at a competitive disadvantage.

Just a few weeks ago, the administration saw the TAA battle as surmountable. Now, unless lawmakers reach consensus soon, the trade pacts won’t pass before the August recess, congressional aides say. After that, chances of passage grow slimmer as the 2012 election nears and lawmakers avoid controversial votes.

“We’re fighting like hell because if the vote doesn’t happen by the recess, we risk it not happening in the fall,” said Christopher Wenk, senior director for international policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. On Thursday, scores of business leaders visited all 100 senators to lobby for the agreements, and they plan to call on each House member in coming days.

Republicans say the administration should move forward on the trade deals and set the TAA dispute aside for later. “Why hold up three agreements that are going to create all kinds of jobs?” said Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.

“We have a duty to help American workers meet the challenge of global competition,” said the panel’s chairman, Sen. Max Baucus (D. Mont.), during a Thursday hearing on the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.

The standoff comes as other nations race to forge trade pacts with nations that are the U.S.’s chief commercial rivals.

In addition to the EU’s impending pact with Korea, a Colombia-Canada pact will enter force before the U.S.’s agreement with Bogota.In Senate testimony last week, Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Demetrios Marantis told the Finance Committee that delays in passing the agreements meant U.S. exporters would lose market share to rival nations.

The three pending trade pacts are the backbone of President Barack Obama’s plan to help businesses double U.S. exports by the end of 2015. Demand from markets abroad has helped support the U.S. economy—and employment—as consumers remain cautious. Exports contributed 1.16 percentage points to growth in the first quarter, when the economy expanded at a 1.8% annual rate.

The Korea deal, worth $11 billion in new U.S. exports, would immediately eliminate Korean tariffs on nearly two-thirds of U.S. farm products, from corn to wheat. U.S. beef exports to Korea would more than double, from to $1.8 billion from $600 million. It would eliminate a 15% Korean tariff on U.S. wine and afford U.S. financial services firms the same legal status as Korean firms.

The TAA program has been backed by both parties since the Kennedy administration, justified as a necessary price to induce lawmakers from industrial regions to support trade-opening legislation.

It provides training, extended unemployment benefits and health-care subsidies for workers idled when trade pacts shift jobs overseas.

But this year, TAA came up for renewal in the teeth of a polarized budget fight. It expired in February after a proposal to renew it failed in the House.

Two weeks ago, White House trade officials took a tough line, saying the president will not submit the finalized trade agreements to a vote until Republicans strike a deal on renewing TAA.

Republicans say the TAA is a sop to organized labor, and its merits don’t justify its inclusion in an already-bloated budget. GOP lawmakers say the program’s budget was swollen by the stimulus and point to past Government Accountability Office studies that question its implementation.

The program, they say, should be scaled back, although as an entitlement, by law it can’t be eliminated altogether.

“Politicians used to use TAA to buy votes for trade agreements, and now they’re holding the trade agreements hostage so they can get the expanded welfare program,” said Sallie James, trade policy analyst at the conservative Cato Institute.

Democrats say the program has grown increasingly important as more companies move jobs overseas, and point to Labor Department figures showing that the program’s size hasn’t changed substantially since before the 2009 stimulus.

In 2002, the program was expanded to include workers whose jobs were lost due to outsourcing in addition to those affected by increased imports. In that year, TAA went to 50,000 people at a cost of $500 million. In 2008, the year before the stimulus, the program cost $916 million. Last year, TAA cost $975 million and 234,000 workers participated.

Leaders of both parties say they’re confident they’ll reach a compromise, but a deal has yet to take shape.

Sarah Thorn, senior director of government relations for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., said business leaders’ efforts to push the two parties together have so far led to frustration.

“Trade agreements have always moved in tandem with TAA—it’s part of the bargain on trade,” she said.

The Korea, Colombia and Panama agreements have been stalled for four years. The repeated delays underscore the difficulty experienced by every administration in overcoming the public skepticism and political roadblocks that have made the U.S. a global laggard on trade. Of the 202 regional trade agreements ever registered with the World Trade Organization, the U.S. accounts for only 11.

Meanwhile, rival nations are moving faster to forge global partnerships that open fast-growing markets for their exporters, and offer subsidies and rules that give their national champions an edge.

Source : The Wall Street Journal

KORUS FTA Stalled, Again?

International Law Firms Plan South Korea Launch

Sunday, March 27th, 2011
International Law Firms Plan South Korea Launch

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org

A few weeks ago a lawyer from a top Washington, DC law firm contacted me about the KORUS FTA and the opening of Korea to global legal firms.  I  feel many international law firms are looking at the Korean market.  It will be smart for them to get lots of local support, and more important develop a sound strategy for market entry. I can help.

Here as recent PR announcing law firm Clifford Chance’s plans of entering the Korean market.

Clifford Chance (CC) looks set to become the first leading City firm to open an office in South Korea, with the firm planning to launch after the country’s legal market is opened up to foreign law firms this summer.

The firm is one of a number of the UK top 10 looking at the region in the wake of a free trade agreement (FTA) between Europe and South Korea that was approved by the European Parliament last month (17 February).

The long-awaited agreement, initially signed at the EU-South Korea summit in Brussels in October last year, sets out a timescale for foreign law firms to open in the market, with international firms to be able to open representative offices from July, once the agreement is ratified.

CC confirmed that it is planning to open in the country, Asia’s fourth-largest economy, once the market is liberalised, with other firms including DLA Piper and Allen & Overy (A&O) in earlier stages of evaluating the market.

CC Asia head Peter Charlton (pictured) said: “We have ambitious plans for growth in Asia and Korea is an important part of that strategy. We welcome the recent legal liberalisation and are working towards having a suitable presence in the country at the first available opportunity.”

Under the terms of the FTA and legislation set out by the South Korean Government, liberalisation is set to happen over three stages.

From July, EU-based law firms will be able to open representative offices in South Korea to advise on non-Korean law. By July 2013 firms will have the right to enter into co-operative agreements with Korean firms and advise on legal issues involving a mixture of domestic and foreign law. By July 2016, EU firms will be able to invest in local firms and hire Korean lawyers.

A&O Asia managing partner Thomas Brown said: “Korea is a very important market in Asia and we are looking at it very seriously, but we haven’t made a decision either way as yet.

“We already have a very healthy South Korea practice and any presence on the ground would help us build on what we already do – especially as we won’t be able to practise local law. So our focus would remain on the international law elements of deals involving South Korea.”

Other firms exploring the market include DLA Piper, where Asia managing director Alastair Da Costa said: “We are very interested in the market, having a thriving Korea practice with lawyers in Tokyo, Hong Kong, London and the US. Korea fits as a geography with our strategic framework and we are keen to explore what we can do to strengthen our position in that market.”

Firms ruling out entering the market in the near-term include Ashurst, Eversheds, Linklaters and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.

Freshfields Asia managing partner Robert Ashworth said: “There are increasing signs of cross-border activity and a renewed confidence of Korean corporates to pursue overseas projects work and acquisitions. The long-awaited liberalisation of the legal market will facilitate this process and I would not be surprised to see law firms from the EU taking advantage of the FTA to open offices. We are continuing to develop our successful offshore Korean practice but I do not anticipate our having a formal presence in Korea in the near term.”

The US signed an FTA with South Korea in June 2007 that so far has yet to be ratified by either government, with several US firms looking at the region in anticipation of the FTA’s ratification.

Source: LINK

International Law Firms Plan South Korea Launch