Posts Tagged ‘Korea legal.org’

Lone Star–Hana Tensions Loom

Sunday, April 24th, 2011
Lone Star  Hana Tensions Loom

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor
This has been a week of suits and counter lawsuits. Samsung and Apple are battling, so are Lone Star and Hana Bank. The Apple-Samsung issue are IP related, so nothing new there.

Regarding the latest chapter in the Lone Star–KEB–Hana saga…

Korea Times notes:
A legal dispute is looming between Hana Financial and Lone Star due to a delay in the government’s approval of their deal over Korea Exchange Bank (KEB).

A source close to Lone Star told The Korea Times, “It’s in the contract. A delay means compensation. If it comes to litigation, so be it.”

Hana is also equally adamant, saying that it is Lone Star’s fault so there is no need for it to pay.

At issue is a clause in the contact in which Hana will pay 4.7 trillion for Lone Star’s 51-percent stake in KEB and management control. The clause stipulates that Hana will have to pay 32.9 billion won ($30 million) per month, for April and May or about 66 billion won, if the deal is not completed by the end of March.

The contract was signed by Kim Seung-yu, Hana chairman, and Lone Star Chairman John Grayken in London, last November.

The sum accounts to 100 won per share for Lone Star’s KEB stake. The clause has come into sharp relief as regulators have indicated that no approval can be expected this month.

“We are not responsible for the delay because Lone Star’s eligibility as the major shareholder of KEB is the main cause,” an official of Hana Financial said, asking not to be named. “We are not ruling out a lawsuit against Lone Star if it insists on having us pay.”

In contrast the source said, “The contract calls on Hana to do its best to get the deal done. Is it doing its best? That is a very important legal question that determines whether Hana should be held responsible or not.” The source, however, said that it could be “legally very tricky.”

Some analysts think it could be hard to hold Lone Star accountable, saying that the clause is aimed at protecting the firm from costs incurred by the delay. Thus, a holdup in the regulators’ decision on the legality of Lone Star’s status as KEB’s majority shareholder is beside the point. If the deal is not consummated by May, their contract will allow one party to call it quits, which would free Hana from any compensation payment.

The compensation clause was included in the contract at the request of Lone Star, which argued that the delay of the deal may limit its rights to sell the lender to other potential buyers. Hana Financial agreed to it because the financial group was sure the deal would be completed by March.

It was encouraged by FSC Chairman Kim Seok-dong, who vowed to conclude the case this month. But a decision may not come until next month at the earliest because the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), the FSC’s executive body, said that no decision was likely in April.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs, the erstwhile biggest shareholder of Hana Financial, unloaded about half of its stake in the banking group Thursday.

The U.S.-based global investment bank sold 7.5 million shares in Hana Financial in a block deal, bringing down its stake to 4.46 percent from about 7.56 percent. The shares, sold in blocks to institutional investors before Thursday’s market opening, fetched 43,000 won ($39.80) each, a discount of about 6.5 percent from the market price. Some say that Goldman Sachs wanted to reduce exposure, judging the Hana-Lone Star deal has become precarious. Others say that it was related to Goldman’s internal cash flow situation.

An appellate Seoul court is currently reexamining a stock manipulation case after the Supreme Court sent it back. Paul Yoo, head of Lone Star’s Korean unit, was cleared of stock manipulation of KEB’s credit card subsidiary in 2003 in a reversal of a lower court’s ruling. The highest court disagreed. Under the Korean Banking Law, a major shareholder of a financial company must not have committed any financial crime within five years.

It is quite possible that the regulators will wait for the high court’s decision before coming up with its own at the risk of going against the ruling.

Lone Star  Hana Tensions Loom

Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

Saturday, February 19th, 2011
Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

Tobacco lawsuits have a long history in the U.S. and West.  Smoking although more than popular in Korea has drawn attention in the wake of the country’s Well-being trend.  This recent court decision echos early efforts to bring lawsuit against Big Tobacco in the American South. The Seoul High Court ruled that there was considerable correlation between smoking and lung cancer.

Big Tobacco on the Dock

A meaningful ruling came out yesterday in a lawsuit filed by a group of smokers against Korea Tomorrow & Global (formerly Korea Tobacco & Ginseng), which manufactures and sells tobacco products. The Seoul High Court ruled that there was considerable correlation between smoking and lung cancer. It added that the plaintiffs had been smoking for a long period of time and suffered lung cancer, acknowledging the epidemiological relevance.

The ruling is the first-ever confirmation of the common knowledge that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer. The appeals court overruled a lower court’s ruling that there was no evidence that proved the plaintiffs suffered from lung cancer as a result of smoking. If the Supreme Court upholds the ruling, it may cause huge repercussions as the decision provides legal grounds for many smokers with lung cancer to file separate lawsuits against tobacco companies.

The appeals court, however, upheld the lower court’s ruling that KT&G was not liable for compensation because the plaintiffs failed to prove that KT&G was involved in illegal practices in the course of manufacturing and selling tobacco.

In other words, the court didn’t agree with the plaintiffs’ argument that the government and KT&G attempted to deceive customers by covering up the dangers of tobacco and mislead them with sales gimmicks, such as calling several tobacco brands “light” or “mild” to make them appear less harmful to the health.

The harmful effects and nicotine addiction have been proven through medical research. As a result, an avalanche of lawsuits were filed not only by individuals or groups but also by health insurance companies and governments in the United States. In 1998, a state government in the U.S. won a lawsuit against tobacco companies and landed a whopping amount of compensation – $246 billion – through a so-called Mass Settlement Agreement. The family of a smoker who died from lung cancer also won a lawsuit against Phillip Morris and received $80 million as punitive compensation.

The victory of KT&G, however, does not grant it immunity from being responsible for causing health problems. It is regrettable that KT&G refused to accept the court’s arbitration plan demanding the company establish a public foundation to alert smokers to health risks.

The central and local governments should also do their bit by increasing the bans on smoking in public places.

Source: JoongAng Daily

Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

Korea, Music, and Copyright Fights

Saturday, October 16th, 2010
Korea, Music, and Copyright Fights

By Don Southerton, Editor
This site is part commentary, part sharing by legal experts based in Korea, and part interesting articles that surface on the web. This story is the later..

Techdirt.com shared a story regarding music copyright issues in the US and in Korea. In fact, they cite http://korealaw.wordpress.com/, a blog by Chung & Partners– a full service law firm in Seoul, Korea.

Korea Gets Its Own Dancing Baby Copyright Fight; Says Free Expression Trumps Copyright Concern

If you follow copyright issues online, by now you’ve undoubtedly heard of the famous Lenz case, involving Universal Music issuing a takedown to YouTube on a 29-second home video a mother took of her toddler son dancing to a Prince song. While Universal didn’t protest the counternotice, the EFF sued, pointing out that it should have taken fair use into account.

Wonil Chung, an intellectual property lawyer in South Korea alerted us to a blog post he wrote about a case that is almost identical to the Lenz case in the US. It involved a father filming his toddler daughter dancing and singing to a Korean pop star. Again, a takedown notice was issued, and the guy sued in response. Of course, it’s worth noting that South Korean copyright law can be much stricter than US copyright law (in part due to lobbying pressure from — you guessed it — US entertainment industry lobbyists as part of a “free trade agreement” the US signed with South Korea). It’s also worth noting that South Korea’s concept of fair use is extremely narrow.

However, thankfully, the court sided with the father, pointing out that the video itself was not a substitute for the song, it had a non-commercial purpose, and only 15-seconds of the song were used. Perhaps most importantly, it noted:
“If this kind of UCC [User Created Content] is barred from uploading online, it results in a unnecessarily excessive restraint on the free expression.”

Even beyond that, unlike the court in the Lenz case, the Korean court ordered the copyright holder to pay the father for “mental damages suffered from the takedown.” This is nice to see, and Chung’s summary of the ruling pretty much wraps it up:

Another interesting part of this ruling is that the court clearly found that the free expression under the constitution of South Korea must be considered fully and fairly in determining whether there exists a copyright infringement or not. Although the Korean Copyright Act has a fair-use-like clause, the clause is stated relatively narrowly so there has been a certain criticism that Korean court is not active in holding up a fair use defense. But this ruling held that the constitutional right of free expression has the equal value as a copyright stated in the Copyright Act which is a subordinate law to the constitution. That’s why I welcome this ruling and expect to see the balance between the free expression and copyright with more fair use defences accepted in the Korean court in the future.

The full Korean post has more details and quotes from the ruling. LINK

Korea, Music, and Copyright Fights

Practical Korean Labor Law: Some Insights

Sunday, August 29th, 2010
Practical Korean Labor Law: Some Insights

This article in Korea Times shares some great insights into Korean labor law and practices. The author, Nick Bibby, is a doctoral student in labor law at Dong-A university in Busan.

Being late isn’t just rude

Practical Korean Labor Law: Some InsightsBy Nick Bibby

Almost every day, the phone rings, or the email pings and, after the niceties, the conversation starts something like this: “My boss says he can’t afford to pay me, is that legal?”

After a few minutes figuring out the details I give the answer I could easily have given to the first question. Essentially, it’s illegal but it’s important to be practical.

Korean law is quite clear that any worker (with the exception of certain people engaged on a specific project) must be paid at least once a month ― it doesn’t matter whether the payment rate is by the hour, the day, the week, the month, or the millisecond.

That’s the important bit, here’s the practical one. Unlike the West, it’s standard in Korea for people to be paid late if the payday falls on a weekend or a national holiday. It’s also fairly routine for the first month’s salary to take its own sweet time.

Legally a salary must be paid once a month, in cash ― which means no payment in kind ― and on an agreed date. However, it’s important to keep a sense of perspective, if your pay’s delayed by 24 hours, it’s annoying but scarcely a crisis. Alternatively if, as with some cases I’ve dealt with, it’s a month, two months, or three months, then clearly it’s a different issue.

Let’s take two examples just from last week. I’ve changed the names so as to not impact any future legal proceedings. Wednesday’s case ― let’s call her Amy ― was straightforward. She was paid late and when the cash finally turned up it was the wrong amount.

Amy’s employer said that he would hold over the first 14 days worth of pay and pay it at the end of the contract. Having talked to her co-workers, Amy quickly realized that her employer had a reputation for non-payment, employment without a visa, dismissal in the 11th month and so forth.

Essentially the boss is either a crook, an idiot or both. The objective here is securing a letter of release and the outstanding money. Amy wants to stay in the country but not in the job.

Although it’s illegal for an employer to discriminate against a worker who has taken legal action against them to protect their rights, it’s usually worth trying to play nice first. The first focus is the letter of release and getting as much of the cash as possible. With both of those life gets easier. If that doesn’t work there are still options.

Critically, whether you resign or are fired (unless it’s for gross-negligence, misconduct or a criminal offense) you must be either given or paid 30 days notice. The idea that if you’re shown the door you have to race to the airport is also a myth.

Your first stop should be your nearest immigration office to extend your visa, usually a simple process. Next is to the Labor Board or, more usually, a foreign workers’ rights center or a migrant workers support organization whose staff have the language skills to handle the case for you. Legally, you must be paid, that’s the bottom line.

Let’s take case number two, let’s call him Ben. He’s due to leave the country at the start of the following week, today is Thursday. His boss has paid him but it’s short by a little over 1.5 million won. In addition, his employer wants to compel him to stay in the country. Let’s deal with the law first, Ben must be paid ― the full amount owed and on time. In addition, an employer cannot oblige a worker to extend their contract.

The question he had is can he withhold his labor until payment is made. It’s a common question and a debatable point. Technically the employer has breached the contract, so Ben would be within his rights ― payment has not been made for work that has been given.

However, whether it’s practical when you’re leaving the country in two days and would need to remain, in practice, to argue the point is another matter.

First there’s the solution mentioned above, extend the visa and fight or hand it over to a human rights organization. When you have a couple of month’s labor as a bargaining chip, it’s got leverage. When it’s a couple of days, less so. As a result the second option is probably better ― especially with his trip around Asia already planned and paid for.

In some ways the important thing is to ensure that issues like this don’t happen to other people. Forty-eight hours before you leave may be too late and a month after you arrive too early to argue a point. With a bit of planning these problems need never emerge.

There are plenty of community organizations out there, some voluntary, others commercial ― some are a bit of both. Late payment and non-payment are fraud and theft respectively. In the same way that anyone knows where their passport, wallet or bankcard is, it’s important to know where you rights are too.

Nick Bibby is deputy CEO of RightsWatch rightswatch.co.kr ― to be launched in early September) and a doctoral student in labor law at Dong-A university in Busan. He can be reached at Nick.bibby@gmail.com

Practical Korean Labor Law: Some Insights

Korean Foreign Direct Investment Update

Friday, July 9th, 2010
Korean Foreign Direct Investment Update

Korean Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a complex topic and we are pleased that Kent Wong, Senior Foreign Attorney (Partner) at APEX LLC keeps us updated on recent changes in the law.  We encourage our readers to contact Kent with questions regarding FDI and related issues.

Preparation, etc. of the Methods to Activate Indirect Investment in Real Estate
- Partial Amendment of the Real Estate Investment Company Act -
(Act No. 10269, enforced as of April 15, 2010)

1. Under the amended Real Estate Investment Company Act, the paid-in capital of a real estate investment company (the “REIC”) shall be lowered to not less than 500 million Korean Won (Article 6). Furthermore, the minimum capital of a real estate investment company for which has held a business permit for six months shall be decreased to 7 billion Korean Won inthe case of a self-management REIC and 5 billion Korean Won in the case of a consigned-management REIC (Article 10). Thus, the investment target of the REIC is expected to extend to small and medium-sized real estate and there will be more investment opportunities for real estate development projects.

2. The ratio of public offering of a REIC shall be lowered from not less than 30/100 to not less than 20/100 and the ratio of share ownership restrictions shall be raised from not less than 30/100 to nor less than 35/100 until December 31, 2012 (provisos to Article 14-3 (1) and Article 15 (1)). It is expected that the investment in a REIC is to be activated and the equity with the indirect real estate investment vehicle is to be secured through the reduction of public offering expenses of the REIC and the inducement of institutional investors.

3. Rights in the use of real estate, such as superficies and leasehold rights and beneficiary interests in real estate trust by which all of the properties in trust are reverted to a beneficiary upon termination of the trust shall be added to the property to be invested in kind to the REIC (Article 19 (2)). It is expected that the minimum capital of the REIC will be more easily secured by expanding the scope of property to be invested in kind to the REIC.

4. In the event where the REIC is not able to respond to the call option of shareholders due to lack of funds to purchase the shares, it may postpone the purchase of shares by obtaining the approval of the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (Article 20 (3)). It is expected that stable operation of the REIC will be possible by allowing the REIC to purchase the shares in consideration of its status of funds.

Preparation, etc. of the Method to Expand Assistance to Foreign-Invested Enterprises

- Partial Amendment of the Foreign Investment Promotion Act -
(Act No. 10272, to be enforced as of October 15, 2010)

1. Under the amended Foreign Investment Promotion Act, more land will be subject to private contracts and decrease of rent for foreign-invested enterprises (Article 13). Thus, the land, etc. that has been created under the Urban Development Act or the Act on the Development and Management of Logistics Facilities will be leased or sold on the basis of private contracts, the term of lease will be increased and the rent will be reduced for foreign-invested enterprises.

2. Of the requirements for assistance in cash to foreign investment, the ‘requirement of the foreign invested amount of not less than USD10 million’ was deleted and the scale of full-time research staff shall be lowered from 10 to 5 persons (Article 14-2 (1)). Thus, small-scaled foreign investment will also be able to receive financial support in cash if the effect of such investment can be proved to be of benefit to the national economy.

Korean Foreign Direct Investment Update

Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

By Don Southerton, Editor Korealegal.org

This story caught my attention. I have great disdain and zero tolerance for those who neglect their children. On the positive side, Koreans focus lots on their families and children. Such negligence is a rare exception. What then stands out in this case is that  legal defense seeks to set a precedence.

The case could set an important legal precedent if it establishes that gaming addiction is a mitigating circumstance in crime.

Korean law accepts drunkenness as such on the basis that the perpetrator is not acting according to his own will. With neither defendant having psychological problems beyond game addiction, the judge may set a precedent.”

Internet Addiction Led To Baby’s Death

By Andrew Salmon for CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Couple pleads guilty to negligent homicide
  • Pair is arrested in March, accused of starving baby to death
  • Police: Couple spent hours on online game where they raised a virtual child
  • Part of couple’s defense includes addiction to Internet gaming

Suwon, South Korea (CNN) – A South Korean couple whose three-month-old daughter died of malnutrition while they were raising a virtual child in an online game pleaded guilty to negligent homicide on Friday.

Kim Jae-beom, 40, and his common-law wife, Kim Yun-jeong, 25, will be sentenced on April 16.

Prosecutors are seeking a five-year sentence for the couple, whose defense included a statement alleging gaming addiction.

The pair is expecting a second child in August. Their first daughter’s name, Kim Sa-rang, means “love” in Korean. She died in September of malnutrition while they were engaged in overnight sessions at a PC Bang, or a 24-hour Internet cafe. The couple would allegedly put her to bed and leave for 10-hour gaming sessions.

They were playing Prius Online, a 3-D fantasy game in which players raise an online girl who gains magic powers as she is nurtured and grows older.

“I think of our baby in heaven,” the father responded when asked if he had anything to say. “I will be guilty until the day I die.”

The father — a slight, gray-haired man and the mother — a visibly emotional woman — were dressed in pale green detention center uniforms. They appeared nervous and timid; neither had previous convictions. The father was a taxi and truck driver, while the mother was unemployed.

They said they met in 2008 and the father introduced Kim to online gaming. Sa-rang was born prematurely in July last year and died a few months later. At the time of death, she weighed 5.5 pounds (2.5 kgs), the court heard. She was 6.4 pounds when she was born.

“When she cried, I cuddled her, but I noticed she was getting thinner,” the mother said, adding that she had not learned about baby care at the hospital nor had she read any books on the subject.

The couple reported the baby’s death to police, who become suspicious about her low weight. They were subsequently arrested and investigated.

“They were addicted to Internet gaming; they put their baby to sleep and came home early in the morning,” said their attorney, Kim Dong-young (no relation) of the Korean Legal Aid Corp. “They regret it, but Ms. Kim is pregnant, please consider this.”

Speaking about his unborn child, the father said: “There will be no second mistake.”

Korea has arguably the world’s most advanced broadband infrastructure, a $5 billion gaming industry and an evolving culture built around gaming. Companies such as Samsung sponsor pro-teams that compete in leagues.

Given the wide availability of the Internet — there are 21,500 PC Bangs nationwide — Web addiction has been widely noted in South Korea, though questions remain on the most appropriate treatment.

How is South Korea trying to beat Internet addiction?

The case could set an important legal precedent if it establishes that gaming addiction is a mitigating circumstance in crime.

Korean law accepts drunkenness as such on the basis that the perpetrator is not acting according to his own will. With neither defendant having psychological problems beyond game addiction, the judge may set a precedent.

“Since they were addicted, the judge could make it a factor in cutting their sentence,” the lawyer said.

Even if he does, Korea is not a litigious society, the lawyer said, and the chances of businesses such as PC Bangs or game developers being sued are low.

The case has sparked interest in the gaming industry.

“I have been reading the articles,” said an employee of “Tony’s,” a PC Bang in Suwon, near the court. But, he said, the case would not have any ramifications for the industry.

The trial lasted just over half an hour in a near-empty courtroom in Suwon, a satellite city an hour south of Seoul best known as home to the factories of Samsung, a leading electronics company.

Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

OECD Cites Korea’s Restrictive Legal and Professional Services

Friday, March 12th, 2010
OECD Cites Koreas Restrictive Legal and Professional Services

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

There is only one lawyer for every 5,891 people, compared to 268 in the U.S. 394 in the U.K. and 560 in Germany.

Chosun Ilbo recently noted that the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in its annual Going for Growth report says Korea “implemented 558 regulatory reforms in the non-manufacturing sector during 2004-2007,” but recommends “promoting greater competition in services, especially in professional services.”

This is no surprise, one of the outcomes of the 1997 IMF Crisis was the opening of Korea to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). International involvement in Banking, for example, is quite widespread. Not so with the legal sector. This however might change with the US Korea FTA and other pending FTAs.

Questions? Comments? Opinions? Please share.

BTW the article points out… First of all, there is a shortage of professionals such as lawyers and doctors in Korea’s service industry. There is only one lawyer for every 5,891 people, compared to 268 in the U.S. 394 in the U.K. and 560 in Germany. There is one accountant for every 3,950 people in Korea, compared to 895 in the U.S., 545 in the U.K. and 1,586 in Japan. The doctor-patient ratio is 1 to 580, the second highest among OECD member countries after Turkey.

Most fields of professional services are restricted to people with licenses, and the unlicensed are prohibited even from becoming partners who mainly provide money needed. It is also forbidden to open businesses in multiple locations, which has made it difficult for specialized service businesses to diversify and led to the emergence of many small private businesses, lowering the overall quality of services offered. Lawyers, certified public accountants and tax accountants are only allowed to hire holders of other licenses to serve as advisors, but not as partners.

In patent or tax legal cases involving several professional fields, clients must turn to big law firms providing all services or take the trouble to contact experts separately in each field. Also, patent agents are barred from handling patent-related lawsuits and tax accountants from playing proxy roles in tax disputes, requiring clients to turn to lawyers in all litigations.

The low supply and high barriers to entry have inevitably led to high fees for professional services. Eighty-five percent of small and medium-sized businesses in Korea cited high costs as the main reason why they avoided legal advisory services.

In the U.S., consumers can buy vitamins, analgesics and digestive tablets in supermarkets, but in Korea they need to go to pharmacies. This is just one illustration of the difficulties posed by the system.

It is consumers who suffer from such regulations and barriers existing due to the vested interests of those concerned and disagreements among government ministries. Once the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement is ratified, Korea will eventually have to open its service market. If the present situation continues, the country may then see the market dominated by foreign businesses.

OECD Cites Koreas Restrictive Legal and Professional Services

Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

Thursday, February 25th, 2010
Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

By Don Southerton, Korea Legal.org Editor

AP notes….WASHINGTON – Even as Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda wrapped up a grueling appearance before Congress, the head of the world’s largest automaker wasn’t leaving his problems behind.

Toyota faces a criminal investigation by federal prosecutors in New York. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company. Its beleaguered U.S. dealerships are facing repairs to potentially millions of customer vehicles that have been recalled. The company is offering customers new reimbursements for rental carsand other expenses.

Its lawyers are bracing for waves of death and injury lawsuits. The Senate will conduct a new hearing next week. And the cost to Toyota’s reputation is only now starting to emerge.

Toyota is taking a beating in the media and in Washington, DC before a congressional hearing. Korea, too, feels the pressure against Toyota, as a respected benchmark for Asian auto success, a desired high quality import, and a rival for Hyundai and  Kia Motors ( globally and even in Korea).  That so, some in Korea feel Toyota is a ripe target for lawsuit.

Chosun Ilbo notes

According to the Seoul Central District Court on Wednesday, a 54-year-old woman identified only as Kim has filed suit against Toyota Motor, Toyota Korea, and Toyota’s Korean dealer Hyosung for damages of W138.9 million (US$1=W1,144), including the car price and compensation. She bought a 2010 Prius Hybrid in September last year.

Kim complains of a serious problem in the car’s braking system, which made her afraid to drive. She alleges that Toyota and others have continued selling cars in the country since 2009 after deliberately covering up serious defects, delaying the improvement of the braking system until this February. Kim suffered no accident.

Her attorneys said it is likely that more buyers of the Prius will sue Toyota due to the latest recall in the U.S.

Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

University of Washington Korean Legal Research

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010
University of Washington Korean Legal Research

By Don Southerton, Korea Legal.org Editor
One goal of Korea Legal.org is to share resources. This UW site  is a great source of information. UW has long been a center for Korean studies in the West.

한국법학연구지침


University of Washington Korean Legal Research