Posts Tagged ‘Expert Witness Korea’

Yale Struggles with Dongguk Lawsuit

Saturday, February 18th, 2012
Yale Struggles with Dongguk Lawsuit

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Seems like Yale University is struggling with the Dongguk lawsuit that stemmed from the Shin Jeong-ah scandal in Korea.

I have long felt that Yale has downplayed the controversy. Perhaps this is in part Yale leadership and lawyers not truly understanding Korean academia and the credibility they place in American universities like Harvard, Princeton and Yale (HPY to Koreans).  Hate to be so bold, but I could help here…. Culture matters.

AP Notes… A federal judge in Connecticut has rejected a second bid by Yale University to throw out all the allegations in a lawsuit filed by a South Korean university that claims it lost tens of millions of dollars after Yale damaged its reputation.

Dongguk University claims in the 2008 lawsuit that it hired an art history professor after Yale wrongly confirmed the professor earned a doctorate at the New Haven school. Court papers say the professor, Shin Jeong-ah, later had a scandalous love affair with an aide to South Korea’s president.

Dongguk, a Buddhist-affiliated university in Seoul, is suing Yale for more than $50 million, saying it lost that amount in government grants, alumni donations and costs of building a law school the government later refused to approve because of the scandal.

U.S. District Judge Tucker Melancon on Friday rejected most of Yale’s motion for summary judgment. While the judge granted Yale’s request to dismiss a civil charge of reckless and wanton conduct, he let stand allegations of defamation and negligence.

A trial is set for June. Yale previously lost a bid to get the lawsuit dismissed.

“We were very pleased with the decision,’’ said Robert Weiner, a New York City lawyer for Dongguk. “We believe we have lots of damages we can establish at trial.’’

Weiner said Dongguk is the most prestigious Buddhist university in the world and it suffered a huge blow to its reputation with the Shin scandal.

Lawyers for Yale didn’t return messages Monday. University officials have said the lawsuit is without merit and they would defend against it.

Shin was sentenced to 18 months in a South Korean jail in March 2008 for using fake Yale credentials to get the professor’s job at Dongguk and for embezzling museum funds. Officials said she also faked two degrees from the University of Kansas in getting the job in 2005.

The former presidential aide, Byeon Yang-kyoon, was accused of using his influence to get Shin hired by Dongguk. He was forced to step down as an aide to then-President Roh Moo-hyun because of the scandal.

Byeon was sentenced to a suspended one-year jail term and 160 hours of community service in 2008 for exercising his influence to provide state tax benefits to a Buddhist temple founded by a former Dongguk official who helped hire Shin as a professor, South Korean officials said.

Yale told Dongguk in June 2007 that Shin didn’t receive a doctorate there, saying a letter confirming the degree that Shin presented to Dongguk was bogus and forged. Yale also told Korean media that it never received a registered letter in 2005 from Dongguk asking whether Shin had received a doctorate, even though it did receive the letter, the lawsuit said.

Yale later apologized to Dongguk in late 2007 for what it called an administrative error. But Dongguk officials said by that time the damage to its reputation had been done. South Korean media reported in the summer and fall of 2007 that Shin’s academic degrees were a fraud, that Dongguk failed to verify Shin’s degrees, that Shin had an affair with Byeon and that Byeon had recommended to Dongguk officials that they hire Shin, court records say.

Source: LINK

Yale Struggles with Dongguk Lawsuit

Southerton Summer Update–Globalization

Saturday, July 9th, 2011
Southerton Summer Update  Globalization

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

Just a short summer update.

Over the past months, FTA, Samsung–Apple, Google, Lone Star KEB, FDI, franchise law, and international job recruitment have been the dominated Korea-facing legal issues. That said, there are local Korean cases that warrant attention, but my focus tends to be global. In fact, most of the articles I provide commentary illustrate the globalization of Korean business. I see this daily in my work–with Korean global firms overseas’ operations, with global firms entering the Korean market, or with global brands looking to provide services to Korean-facing firms.

This trend will continue. In turn it is inevitable that more legal issues and lawsuits will surface.

Southerton Summer Update  Globalization

KORUS FTA Update

Saturday, January 22nd, 2011
KORUS FTA Update

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

Following the latest news on KORUS FTA, it looks like treaty might be presented to the U.S. Senate by July 2011.

That said, what specifcally still needs to occur?…

The President may form and negotiate a treaty, but the treaty must be advised and consented to by a 2/3 vote in the Senate. Only after the Senate approves the treaty can the President ratify it.

KORUS FTA Update

U.S. Eyes Korea Trade Deal Approval by July–Kirk

WASHINGTON, Jan 13 – President Barack Obama’s administration hopes to win congressional approval of a free trade agreement with South Korea before July, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said on Thursday.

“Everything we’re doing in terms of finalizing the text with Korea, working with committees is with that July 1 goal in mind,” Kirk said during a discussion on the pact hosted by Third Way, a Washington-based policy group.

The July 1 date is key because that’s when a rival trade agreement between South Korea and the European Union takes force, Kirk told the group.

The administration also supports approval of two other free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama, but it would “be a huge mistake to try to force all of the trade agreements into one lump vote with Korea,” Kirk said.

Each agreement has its own challenges and should be considered separately, he said.

Kirk indicated Obama would talk about his plans for the three trade agreements in his annual State of the Union speech on January 25.

South Korean Ambassador Han Duk-soo urged the administration to send the deal to Congress “as soon as possible” so U.S. farmers and businesses will not be put at a competitive disadvantage when the EU pact took force.

The pact with South Korea is the biggest of three trade agreements negotiated by the administration of former President George W. Bush but which have stalled in Congress because of strong opposition from Democrats.

Late last year, the Obama administration renegotiated the auto provisions of the agreement to win the support of the United Auto Workers labor union and Ford Motor Co <F.N>, which previously had opposed the pact.

Those changes mean winning approval of the pact will no longer be as “horribly difficult” as it once was, but it will still face stiff opposition in Congress, Kirk said.

“We believe we can get it done,” Kirk said.

Republicans want votes this year on all three pending agreements, but many Democrats are still resisting action on the pact with Colombia because of concern about a history of anti-union violence in that country.

That has clouded prospects for the Panama agreement, since it is considered unlikely Obama would submit that agreement to Congress without also sending the Colombian pact.

The U.S. International Trade Commission estimated in 2007 that the Korean agreement would boost U.S. exports by about $10 billion to $11 billion annually, while increasing imports from that country by about $6.5 billion to $7.0 billion.

A wide swath of U.S. farm, manufacturing and service industry groups support the agreement. But the AFL-CIO, the country’s main labor organization, remains opposed to it.

Both Han and Kirk touted the economic benefits of the pact, which they said would support jobs in both countries.

The United States will gain more in the short-term from market-opening commitments since it already has lower tariffs than South Korea, Han said.

But Seoul sees the pact as key to its long-term prosperity because it locks the country into a comprehensive package of economic reforms, Han said.

Approval would also send the region an important geopolitical signal that the United States intends to remain engaged, Ha

KORUS FTA Update

2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

Friday, January 7th, 2011
2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

For a full text of the report CLICK HERE

2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

Franchise Korea

Monday, November 1st, 2010
Franchise Korea

By Don Southerton, Editor

I wear many hats. I see myself as an author, global cross-cultural expert, historian, and legal consultant / expert witness. That said, my core work centers on providing strategy, consulting, coaching, and insights into Korea-facing global business.

Most recently, my company Bridging Culture Worldwide is supporting the launch of a number of franchises in Korea and Asia-Pacific. We also represent some top American and UK retail brands, which we seek to license in Korea.

Regarding our franchise efforts… International franchising typically involves the mother company working with a local “master franchisee”–often called a “regional developer.” This master franchisee/ regional developer can either be a 100% subsidiary of the mother company or a joint venture company with a local partner.

In turn, the local company  can either operate company owned locations or may also rely on “sub-franchisees” for running franchise outlets, which are owned and operated by an independent person or entity – a pure sub-franchisee.

In working with its clients, BCW’s key role is bridging cross-cultural issues, providing sound market entry strategy, finding qualified partners, and securing solid licensing and franchise agreements.  We understand Korea and what it takes to succeed.

For a great summary of Korean Franchise Laws    CLICK HERE

For more information, contact  Dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com

Franchise Korea

Someone asked…So here’s my legal consulting and expert witness CV

Sunday, June 27th, 2010
Someone asked...So heres my legal consulting and expert witness CV
Don Southerton
CEO, Bridging Culture Worldwide
Services Provided
For cases related to Korean culture and norms, Korean business, Family, IP, and most of Korea’s major conglomerates (including Samsung, Hyundai-Kia Motors, SK, Hanjiin, Hyosung, and LG), we provide strategy, expert opinion testimony, litigation testimony, and case review for Defense and Plaintiff.
Authority on
Korea, Korean global business norms, Korean domestic business, Korean workplace, Korean expatriates, Korean gender, Korean IP, Korean education, Korean cross-cultural issues, US-Korean business relations, Korean technology, Korean FDI, Korean luxury goods and market, Korean real estate development, Korean automotive industry, Korean consumer and service industry.
Experience
Don Southerton is an author, advisor, consultant, strategist, and coach working with many of the top Korean-based global corporations, along with major western firms that have ventures related to Korea.
As an expert witness, Southerton has worked on cases involving wrongful death, international family law, and personal injury. By virtue of his education, experience, training, and skills courts in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and California have accepted his testimony and expertise.
Education
B. A. History. University of Colorado, Denver.

M. A. History. University of Colorado, Denver.

Post Graduate Study
University of Southern California (USC).

University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).

Intercultural Institute of California, San Francisco (IIC).

University of California, San Diego, Graduate School of International

Relations (UCSD).

A detailed curriculum vitae and fee schedule/agreement will be provided upon request.
Someone asked...So heres my legal consulting and expert witness CV

Korean Law School Strives to Educate Koreans Students in U.S. Law

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010
Korean Law School Strives to Educate Koreans Students in U.S. Law

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

I found this to be interesting. First the school is in Pohang, which is in southeast Korea and home to POSCO Steel. Second, it seems to be strongly supported by the Christian Legal Society, a non-denominational US-based Christian membership association of lawyers, judges, law professors, law students.

Joongang Ilbo notes
Although Handong International Law School in Pohang, North Gyeongsang, has a short history, it has made great strides toward educating Korean students in U.S. law and helping them to secure jobs overseas.

The school was established in 2002 by Handong Global University with the goal of providing an American-style law school curriculum and nurturing prospective attorneys who will practice in the United States.

Since then, of the 199 students who have graduated from Handong so far, 105 of them have passed bar exams in the United States.

In an interview with Eric Enlow, the dean of Handong International Law School, Enlow said that Handong is making remarkable progress, especially considering that an average of only 32 percent of bar exam applicants who were educated in countries other than the United States pass the U.S. bar exam.

“Fifty-three percent of our graduates have passed bar exams in seven U.S. states including Tennessee and Missouri,” Enlow said. “This is the first time that a Korean law school has produced more than 100 students who passed U.S. bar exams.”

Handong is the only university in Korea that offers and meets the academic requirements set forth by the American Bar Association, which accredits U.S. law schools.

Although the American Bar Association does not accredit foreign law schools outside of the United States and Canada, some states, such as Tennessee, permit the graduates of some foreign law schools to take their state bar exam. Other states, like New York, only allow graduates of foreign law schools who have completed an LL.M. degree at an accredited U.S. law school to take the bar exam.

“Those who have obtained a legal license to practice in the U.S. take jobs in various fields that would not usually be open to an attorney who passed the Korean bar exam,” Enlow said. “We have graduates working at the top five law firms in the U.S., such as Paul Hastings. And between 50 and 60 Handong graduates now work at eight law firms in Korea.”

While there are graduates who work in the legal departments of Korean companies, there are others who serve as legal advisers or attorneys at NGOs working on human rights issues, Enlow added.

Some graduates also get well-paying jobs without obtaining licenses in the United States, Enlow added.

Although Handong is located in the city of Pohang, which is outside of Seoul, Enlow explained the school is quite international. Over 20 percent of Handong International Law School students are foreigners and most of them are scholarship students from developing countries, he said.

“Three graduates work at Vietnamese law firms and a Jordanian graduate works as a United Nations High Commissioner,” he said.

All Handong classes are conducted in English and all put a heavy emphasis on in-class discussions, Enlow said.

“As Handong was established to nurture attorneys in the U.S., our curriculum is very similar to that offered in law schools in the United States, so that’s why states like Tennessee have permitted our students to take their bar exams,” Enlow said. “Students can study here, with a curriculum that is similar to that offered in U.S. law schools, at half the price.”

When asked whether he has any regrets about taking a position that pays him less than he would make as an attorney in the United States, Enlow, a Yale alumnus, said his income has changed drastically but that he had found meaningful work here based on his Christian faith.

Most of the school’s 12 faculty members are members of the Christian Legal Society and many consider teaching here as volunteer work.

“My wife and four children live here with me and my wife educates my children at home,” Enlow. “I’m satisfied with life here and I want to continue working here.”

Korean Law School Strives to Educate Koreans Students in U.S. Law

Korea Legal 2010

Saturday, January 9th, 2010
Korea Legal 2010

By Don Southerton, Korea Legal Editor

It’s a new year. In 2010, we’ll be asking top experts to contibute to this Blog. Look for timely posting on a number of Korea-related legal and business issues.

I’ve also renamed the site to reflect it’s evolving scope.

Interested in contributing?

Please contact me at dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com

Korea Legal 2010

Legal Implications of Harassment in the Korean Workplace

Friday, April 17th, 2009
Legal Implications of Harassment in the Korean Workplace

By Don Southerton, Korea Expert Witness Editor and Chief Blogger

For firms and individuals doing business in Korea ( or overseas divisions wishing to better understand the Korean-side of operations) it is important to know about the laws that govern sexual harassment in the Korean workplace. Rules and laws vary globally. I follow Korea’s carefully, most often to share with non-Korean management on expectations for their Korean teams in the host country. In some cases, Koreans working overseas feel they can bend the rules while working abroad–rules they would need to follow in Korea.

In Korea, harassment is governed under the Gender Equality Employment Act (GEEA). In terms of what constitutes sexual harassment, GEEA cites:

* Unwelcome sexual advances, including repeated, unwelcome or intimidating social invitations;

* Suggestions that sexual cooperation or the toleration of sexual advances may further a person’s career;

* Unwelcome verbal, non-verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature including sexually derogatory or stereotyped remarks; sexual propositioning; leering and lewd gestures; touching, grabbing or deliberately brushing up against another person; or persistent questioning about a person’s sex life.

* Conduct of sexual nature that creates a hostile or intimidating work environment; this includes sexual or obscene jokes, or displaying sexist or other sexually offensive pictures, calendars or posters around the workplace.

Alcohol

It’s no surprise that many incidents of sexual harassment take place after work, during employee dinners, or during the late night drinking sessions. Rooted in traditional culture, the goal of such events is to build team spirit and morale, but large amounts of alcohol can lead to sexual harassment

Employers Obligations

Paul Cho of the Korean law firm Kim and Chang points out in his article on sexual harassment ” Unwanted Attention,” GEEA guidelines for employers. They include:

In terms of training, employers shall provide their employees (including temps) with education for preventing sexual harassment in the form of training, morning meetings, conferences, etc., at least once a year with due consideration for the Company’s circumstances.

Violation of this requirement can result in the company being assessed an administrative fine not exceeding three million won ( $3-4000 US). The contents of this education training should include a review of the relevant provisions of the GEEA, corporate guidelines and policies regarding the intolerance of any sexual harassment in the workplace, victim counseling and grievance system and other preventive measures to prohibit sexual harassment.

Another importance of this training is that, once a sexual harassment claim is lodged with the labor authorities, one of the first things they will check is whether the employer has complied with its annual training requirement. If the answer is no, it will not be hard for the labor authorities to conclude that the employer did not take the proper actions required in terms of a sexual harassment claim as it did not even train its employees on how to, for example, prevent sexual harassment.

The GEEA also requires the employer to include disciplinary policies and procedures as to harassers in the employer’s rules and regulations and to impose an appropriate sanction, if any, against the harasser such as a transfer to another department, warning, suspension, unpaid leave, dismissal, etc., taking into account the severity and duration of the misconduct, violation of which can result in the employer being assessed an administrative fine not exceeding five million won. In addition, an employer that commits sexual harassment shall be subject to an administrative fine not exceeding 10 million won ($10-12,000 US) by the labor authorities

It also bears mentioning that, any retaliatory action against a victim of sexual harassment making a claim can result in the employer’s registered representative being subject to imprisonment for not more than three years or a criminal fine not exceeding 20 million wo

Technically speaking, a company with at least 30 employees under ordinary circumstances shall be obligated to establish a grievance council with an equal number of representative members from management and the employees, provided that the employee-side of such council should, to the extent possible, include female employees based on the ratio of female employees in the company. In the alternative (as there is no sanction under the GEEA for failure to set up a grievance council), a company’s Labor Management Council (which is required for companies with at least 30 employees under ordinary circumstances) or the company’s Human Resources Department may fill this role of taking charge of counseling and the handling of grievances. An outside specialist is also allowed to take charge thereof.

Questions? Comment? Please feel free to comment or, contact us at dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com
or call 1-310-866-3777

Legal Implications of Harassment in the Korean Workplace

Welcome

Sunday, January 11th, 2009
Welcome
Welcome

Don Southerton, Editor and Chief Blogger

ENTER

Our Goals

This resource shares recent developments in U.S.-Korean legal and business affairs, as well as topics such as family court, litigation, labor, and intellectual property issues.

We support the Blogger’s Code of Ethics as posted in www.cyberjournalist.net. We will abide by three main principles, “be honest and fair, minimize harm and be accountable.”

We strictly prohibit any postings that contain incorrect or misleading information.

Our Experts and Chief Blogger

Working with our team of experts and contributors is Bridging Culture Worldwide (BCW) CEO and President Don Southerton. Look for posting by top legal experts on Korea and international law related to Korean business.

Contribute your thoughts to this Blog…

Please note we promote open communications. In order to protect against spam and abusive remarks, all comments will be reviewed before being posted. That said, we look forward to your thoughts, contributions, and participation.

Follow me on Twitter

Watch me on YouTube

Join me on Facebook

Connect with me on Linkedin

Enter Here

 

Welcome