Posts Tagged ‘Don Southerton expert witness’

Special Report KORUS FTA–An Auto Sector Update

Friday, December 10th, 2010
Special Report KORUS FTA  An Auto Sector Update

By Don Southerton, Editor

Since 2006, BCW has been following the KORUS FTA discussions. As strong supporters of free trade, globalization, and the Hyundai Kia Motor Group and its US operations, we have provided research, numerous updates, and insights to US and Korean leadership. We have maintained an active role in supporting the treaty and US-Korea relations along with maintaining close ties with Koreans and Americans officials and scholars highly involved in KORUS.

Last week, after months of talks, an agreement was reached ( it still needs to be ratified by the U.S.). We provide the following key points. Part 1 includes general terms of the agreement. Part 2 is related to the auto sector, with Part 3 focuses on auto parts.

Part 1.  Pending Congressional Approval

The United States and the Republic of Korea signed the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) on June 30, 2007. If approved, the Agreement would be the United States’ most commercially significant free trade agreement in more than 16 years.

The U.S. International Trade Commission estimates that the reduction of Korean tariffs and tariff-rate quotas on goods alone would add $10 billion to $12 billion to annual U.S. Gross Domestic Product and around $10 billion to annual merchandise exports to Korea.

Under the FTA, nearly 95 percent of bilateral trade in consumer and industrial products would become duty free within three years of the date the FTA enters into force, and most remaining tariffs would be eliminated within 10 years.

For agricultural products, the FTA would immediately eliminate or phase out tariffs and quotas on a broad range of products, with almost two-thirds (by value) of Korea’s agriculture imports from the United States becoming duty free upon entry into force.

For services, the FTA would provide meaningful market access commitments that extend across virtually all major service sectors, including greater and more secure access for international delivery services and the opening up of the Korean market for foreign legal consulting services.

In the area of financial services, the FTA would increase access to the Korean market and ensure greater transparency and fair treatment for U.S. suppliers of financial services.

The FTA would address non-tariff barriers in a wide range of sectors and includes strong provisions on competition policy, labor and environment, and transparency and regulatory due process.

The KORUS FTA would also provide U.S. suppliers with greater access to the Korean government procurement market. In addition to strengthening our economic partnership, the KORUS FTA would help to solidify the two countries’ long-standing geo-strategic alliance.

As the first U.S. FTA with a North Asian partner, the KORUS FTA could be a model for trade agreements for the rest of the region, and underscore the U.S. commitment to, and engagement in, the Asia-Pacific region.

The Obama Administration will seek to promptly and effectively address the issues surrounding the KORUS FTA, including concerns that have been expressed regarding automotive trade.

Part 2 Auto Sector

The following are the major aspects of the supplementary alterations on auto trade and other issues in the South Korea-U.S. free trade agreement.

1. Automotive safety standards South Korea agreed to soften its auto safety standards for U.S.-made cars. In the previous deal, there was an automatic two-year grace period before U.S. auto manufacturers had to meet any new Korean regulations related to self-certification for safety standards. 

The supplemental agreement allows for 25,000 cars per U.S. automaker – or almost four times the number allowed in the 2007 agreement — to be imported into Korea if they meet U.S. safety standards.

2. Automotive emission standards South Korea will exempt low-volume importers from its ultra low emissions vehicle (ULEV) standard that is scheduled to take effect from 2015. Under the new standard, South Korea will apply tougher efficiency criteria for vehicles, requiring vehicles to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to 140 grams per kilometer. Under the supplemental agreement, all U.S. autos will be considered compliant with new Korean environmental standards on fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions, developed since the 2007 agreement, if they achieve 119 percent of the targets in these regulations.

3. Automotive tariffs elimination Under the 2007 agreement, all tariffs on automotives would have been immediately eliminated gradually within three years after the implementation of the accord. The new agreement allows the U.S. to keep its 2.5 percent tariff on autos in place until the fifth year. At the same time, South Korea will immediately cut its tariff on U.S. auto imports in half (from 8 percent to 4 percent), and fully eliminate the tariff in the fifth year.

4. Tariffs on pick-up trucks In 2007, the U.S. agreed to phase out its 25 percent tariff on South Korean trucks in 10 years. But the new agreement allows the U.S. to maintain its tariff until the eighth year and then phase it out by the tenth year.

5. Tariffs on electric cars Under the 2007 agreement, the U.S. and South Korea would have eliminated tariffs on electric cars and plug-in hybrids by 10 years after the implementation of the accord. The new agreement calls for South Korea to immediately reduce its electric car tariffs from 8 percent to 4 percent, and both countries will then phase out their respective tariffs by the fifth year.

6. Special safeguard for automotive industry The previous agreement had no provision on safeguard measures specific to the auto industry. Under the 2010 supplemental agreement, both sides agreed to introduce safeguard measures for motor vehicles.

Part 3, Regarding Auto Parts

BCW sees no changes from the 2007 agreement, “Tariffs would be immediately reduced to zero in each country for auto parts imported from the other.” That said, there are however a few exceptions regarding tires and some plastics.  As soon, as a final agreement is ratified, BCW will provide an itemized list of those items still with tariff restrictions and a timeline for their reduction.

For additional questions, please contact Don Southerton,  dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com 1-310-866-3777

Special Report KORUS FTA  An Auto Sector Update

Battle for Control of Hyundai E&C

Saturday, November 20th, 2010
Battle for Control of Hyundai E&C

By Don Southerton, Korealegal.org Editor

Korean business is dominated by the large industrial groups, commonly called chaebol. Most have strong family management ties. Most are now entering the third generation of family leadership. A common trait is often internal family scandals and struggles over control. The recent bidding war over Hyundai Engineering and Construction has drawn much attention with the Hyundai Group out bidding Hyundai Kia Motor Group. Immediately following the announcement, concerns surfaced on Hyundai Group’s ability to cover the  $5 billion price tag and commitment to invest considerable more…

Media notes:

Happy in Heaven, What about on Earth

By In-soo Nam

If you needed more evidence that Hyundai Group’s winning bid for Hyundai Engineering & Construction was driven by sentiment, you got it Thursday.

In a short statement, Hyundai Group Chairwoman Hyun Jeong-eun referred to the deal as something for the deceased to be happy about.

She was referring to Chung Ju-yung, who founded Hyundai Engineering & Construction, and his son and her late husband, Chung Mong-hun, the previous chairman of Hyundai Group.

“We’ve finally regained Hyundai Engineering & Construction, for which the late honorary Chairman Chung Ju-yung did the first spade work and which was deeply cherished by the late Chairman Chung Mong-hun. The two in heaven must be very happy,” she wrote.

Back here on Earth, questions remain about the logic of the bid.

Ms. Hyun promised to make sure the acquisition won’t hurt Hyundai Group’s financial soundness. But she and other executives haven’t said how they will pay the reported bidding price of over $5 billion for the builder, which is bigger than all of its other businesses combined.

Share prices of Hyundai Group’s affiliated companies have declined sharply since it was declared the winner on Tuesday.

On top of that, it vowed Thursday to invest $17.6 billion in the construction firm by 2020–double the amount proposed by its rival bidder, Hyundai Motor Group

Source LINK

A related article notes:

No Hyundai “Curse of the Winner”?

By Kanga Kong

After winning the battle to take control of Hyundai Engineering, you’d think that Hyundai Group would be popping open the champagne.

Not so, it seems.

Following the news, Hyundai Group quickly released a statement to counter concerns that it was overreaching.

“The Group will make sure there will be no problem in carrying out the funding plan,” it said.

The market wasn’t so sure, with shares of both Hyundai Merchant Marine, the key affiliate of unlisted Hyundai Group, and Hyundai Engineering, ending down by the daily limit of 15%.

In contrast, Hyundai Motor, the main listed affiliate of the other bidder for Hyundai Engineering, bucked a falling market, rising 2.6%.

Hyundai Group used a familiar expression among Koreans to refer to the jitters among investors: “The curse of the winner… is no more than an obscure fear of the market,” it said.

Locals associate the term “curse of the winner” with Kumho Asiana Group, which put Daewoo Engineering & Construction back up for sale just three years after it bought it in 2006.

The high price it paid to buy the construction firm later triggered a group-wide liquidity shortage that forced it to sell a lot of its assets.

Source LINK

Battle for Control of Hyundai E&C

Franchising in Korea: An Overview

Sunday, November 7th, 2010
Franchising in Korea: An Overview

By Don Southerton, Editor

Korea Legal.org looks at Korea-facing legal issues and shares insights into a wide variety of topics. Franchising comes with its own set of rules, regulations, and compliance. With regard to Korea, franchising is popular. Korea Times‘ reporter Cathy Rose A. Garcia provides a great overview of the industry.

Franchise businesses booming in Korea

By Cathy Rose A. Garcia

What do BBQ Chicken, McDonald’s, Caffe Bene and Starbucks have in common? Aside from being popular food and drink businesses, all are franchises of international and Korean brands. Plus all of them have a ubiquitous presence in Korea.

The franchise industry has been growing significantly in the past few years in Korea. The trend was jumpstarted by fast food restaurants, which was followed by family restaurants, clothing chains, cleaning services, educational institutions and discount stores.

In 1999, the number of franchise businesses in Korea was only around 1,500 with 120,000 outlets. Now, the number has doubled.

According to the Ministry of Knowledge Economy’s distribution and logistics division, the franchise industry in Korea is worth an estimated $70.2 billion. Franchises for food services, including fast food chains and family restaurants, account for around 52 percent or $36.5 billion.

The retail sector, such as convenience stores and consumer goods, accounts for 36.2 percent or $25.4 billion of the total. The remaining 11.8 percent or $8.2 billion includes education, real estate, cleaning and mailing services.

And judging by the good turnout at the Franchise Seoul 2010 at the COEX last week, there is still a growing demand for these business opportunities. The fair featured mostly food service franchises, with familiar names such as Home Chicken, Papa John’s and Subway. There were also representatives from retail, children’s products, education, computers, health aids, cosmetics and rental services.

Experts believe the potential for the franchise industry are bright, especially in the service sector. Among the areas with good prospects are: senior care, party planning and catering, fitness, personal services, frozen yogurt, green growth, pet products and children’s items.

Capital costs

Lee Seong-kyu, a 35-year-old office worker, said he was looking for business ideas at the Franchise Seoul fair. He was considering opening a foreign food outlet but the popular franchises require a lot of capital, not to mention finding the right location.

“A franchise might seem easier because the business has already been tried and tested. The only obstacle would be raising the capital, some require big franchise and royalty fees, plus the equipment and rental expenses,’’ Lee said.

Data compiled by the Seoul Global Business Center showed that the average capital necessary to open a store is over 100 million won. Opening a restaurant or a bakery would need around 200 million won, while a service-related franchise would entail around 170 million won.

A report by the U.S. Commercial Service Market Report 2010 indicated that U.S. franchises are sought-after in Korea. “Korean franchisees are seeking and prefer to do business with U.S. franchisers that can offer established brand names to Korean consumers and value the transfer of American management skills provided by U.S. headquarters,’’ the report said.

But potential Korean franchisees are turned off by the high fees and royalties required by the American headquarters.

Subway, the American sandwich chain, charges a franchise fee of $10,000, but the total investment, including equipment, lease, and supplies, would reach between 100 million to 130 million won.

Another American pizza chain Papa John’s demands a 20 million won franchise fee, and an ongoing royalty of 5 percent of net sales every month, with a total cost of roughly 150 million won.

“Other common franchising requirements, such as a minimum facility size and the expected number of store openings within a certain period are often very challenging for Korean franchisers to meet,’’ the report said.

Boom in local franchises

There’s no doubt international franchises remain prominent, but domestic chains are also becoming popular among local businessmen. Korean franchises do not require much capital or large royalties. Also unlike foreign franchises, the local ones are already attuned to Korean tastes and targeting Korean consumers.

Consider the fried chicken craze in recent years. The Korea Franchise Association reported there are about 35,000 fried chicken franchises in the Korean market, as of last year, led by popular brands such as Kyochon Chicken, BBQ Chicken and Two Two Fried Chicken.

Another fried chicken chain, Chicken Mania, requires a 5 million won franchise fee and no royalties. The estimated total cost in opening a Chicken Mania franchise is around 46.5 million won.

To open a Cafe Kai ice cream & coffee shop branch, one needs to have 66 million won, which includes the 5 million won franchise fee and 3 million won in royalties.

Jun Hyung-joon, a franchising consultant, said the hottest property in Korea right now is local brand Caffe Bene. The coffee shop chain has set the record for the highest number of stores opened in the shortest amount of time, as it aims to challenge American giant Starbucks in Korea. It opened in 2008, but in just two years, the company has expanded to 240 stores.

As a purely local franchise brand, Caffe Bene serves special blend coffee, Belgian waffles and Italian gelato. Its menu might not seem that different from Starbucks, Coffee Bean, Angel-in-Us and Holly’s, but it has appealed to many customers because of its lower prices, comfortable atmosphere and the fact that it donates a portion of its profits to charity.

To open a Caffe Bene store, one needs to invest at least 215.8 million won, according to the company website. This includes the 10 million won franchise fee, 100 million won for the interior and 78 million won for the supplies.

Caffe Bene’s growth has been attributed to the use of Korean celebrities to promote the brand. “The growth has been so fast. Their rapid growth also has something to do with “star marketing.” They use popular stars to promote the cafe. Star marketing is always effective in Korea,’’ Jun said.

However, its effectiveness has only been proven in Korea. As Caffe Bene looks to the overseas market for future growth, there are doubts whether it can replicate its success. Hallyu or Korean wave remains strong in Asia, but Jun expressed doubts whether Korean celebrity endorsements could help Caffe Bene with its plans to expand into Asian countries.

Tips for franchisees

Before deciding on whether to sign a contract with a franchiser, Jun suggests doing a lot of research and making inquiries about the company first.

“There’s a franchise information disclosure law, so they are required to provide the information. You can check all the information online, to see how many outlets they have and their sales. Also check the credibility and credit standing of the franchisor to make sure it is stable,’’ Jun said.

The franchisors should provide all prospective franchisees with a disclosure document at least 14 days before signing an agreement or payment of the fees. If the disclosure is not made, the franchisee can demand a refund of its payment. Franchisors are also required to register the disclosure statements with the Korea Fair Trade Commission.

“It is also best to consult with a franchise consultant, since it is our job to guide the franchisee through the entire process,’’ Jun added.

Franchising in Korea: An Overview

New Korean Journal Focuses on Business and Foreign Investment Law

Sunday, July 18th, 2010
New Korean Journal Focuses on Business and Foreign Investment Law

Thought this was timely since we posted several articles on Korean FDI.

Korea media notes that the Ministry of Justice  has published an English-language journal on major foreign investment-related articles, court rulings, immigration rules and other information foreign investors need to know.

The ministry will initially publish 500 copies and distribute them to embassies, law schools and justice ministries in countries with an interest in Korea. It plans to publish more if deemed necessary.

The magazine, titled “Recent Trends of Law and Regulation in Korea: Focusing on Business and Investment,” will be published on a quarterly basis, it said.

This is a response to chronic complaints from foreign investors who have struggled with a lack of credible sources of information about Korea’s legal system, the ministry explained.

“We expect the book will help deepen investors’ knowledge and understanding about Korean law,” said Lee Ki-young, a ministry official. “This will also serve as the most credible source for overseas researchers and experts.”

Lee said the ministry will gradually extend the scope of issues covered by the magazine and also shorten the period of time for updates to make it possible for foreign investors to get access to up-to-date information as quickly as possible.

The government has paid greater attention to providing legal information in foreign languages, particularly English, with the strong belief that this will help boost the country’s international competitiveness.

Along with the justice ministry, the Ministry of Government Legislation (MOLEG) is also translating Korean laws and regulations into English.

MOLEG has run a website (oneclick.law.go.kr) providing basic legal information on six major subjects in English to support English-speaking foreigners here ― foreign investment, foreign workers’ employment, foreign students, interracial marriage, overseas Koreans and transportation/driving.

Source: Korea Times

New Korean Journal Focuses on Business and Foreign Investment Law

Someone asked…So here’s my legal consulting and expert witness CV

Sunday, June 27th, 2010
Someone asked...So heres my legal consulting and expert witness CV
Don Southerton
CEO, Bridging Culture Worldwide
Services Provided
For cases related to Korean culture and norms, Korean business, Family, IP, and most of Korea’s major conglomerates (including Samsung, Hyundai-Kia Motors, SK, Hanjiin, Hyosung, and LG), we provide strategy, expert opinion testimony, litigation testimony, and case review for Defense and Plaintiff.
Authority on
Korea, Korean global business norms, Korean domestic business, Korean workplace, Korean expatriates, Korean gender, Korean IP, Korean education, Korean cross-cultural issues, US-Korean business relations, Korean technology, Korean FDI, Korean luxury goods and market, Korean real estate development, Korean automotive industry, Korean consumer and service industry.
Experience
Don Southerton is an author, advisor, consultant, strategist, and coach working with many of the top Korean-based global corporations, along with major western firms that have ventures related to Korea.
As an expert witness, Southerton has worked on cases involving wrongful death, international family law, and personal injury. By virtue of his education, experience, training, and skills courts in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and California have accepted his testimony and expertise.
Education
B. A. History. University of Colorado, Denver.

M. A. History. University of Colorado, Denver.

Post Graduate Study
University of Southern California (USC).

University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).

Intercultural Institute of California, San Francisco (IIC).

University of California, San Diego, Graduate School of International

Relations (UCSD).

A detailed curriculum vitae and fee schedule/agreement will be provided upon request.
Someone asked...So heres my legal consulting and expert witness CV

U.S.-Korean International Child Custody Fight

Sunday, June 13th, 2010
U.S. Korean International Child Custody Fight

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Child custody cases draw much emotion. International child custody cases even more so, and occur when a parent leaves with the children or in this case refuses to abide to a court order. (See my article on Korea and the Hague Parental Child Abduction Convention HERE)

NJ Man Embroiled In US-Korea Custody Battle

Alejandro Mendoza Fighting For Custody Of Children, Trying To Clear His Name After Wife Accuses Him Of Abusing Kids

A New Jersey man is fighting for his family and defending his name after his wife took his children and accused him of abuse. Two young children are at the heart of an international custody battle, with their mother behind bars and their father fighting to clear his own name. Those circumstances dominated a routine status conference in the Bergen County Courthouse Friday morning.

The case involves Broadway violinist Alejandro Mendoza, who owns a popular music school in Tenafly, and the fallout from his troubled marriage to concern violinist Si Nae Shim, who’s currently being held in the Bergen County Jail on a charge of interference with custody.

Their problems began in the spring of last year, when Mendoza says he gave in to his wife’s wishes and moved the family back to her native South Korea, where he was hired as a university professor. However, he says he changed his mind after about two months and returned to the United States to explore getting a new job here.

“She did call me from Korea and tell me not to come back,” Mendoza said.

Mendoza did go back – with an order of custody from Bergen County courts – but he found his apartment in South Korea empty, and his wife and two young children were gone.

“No parent should ever have to go through what I have gone through for a year,” Mendoza said.

Around the same time, Shim – still in South Korea – accused Mendoza of sexually abusing their children, a charge Mendoza denies.

“This is the most devastating thing that can be done to a loving father, such a monstrous thing,” Mendoza said. ” This is going to hurt the children.”

While traveling in Guam, Shim was arrested for violating the custody order and extradited back to the United States. The children are still in South Korea, living with Shim’s family.

There are several issues on the table, and as attorneys for both sides try to resolve criminal charges and custody rights for the couple’s two children, Judge Carver is keeping everyone on a tight leash in the interest of putting the children first. Everyone is due back in court next Friday.

U.S. Korean International Child Custody Fight

Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

By Don Southerton, Editor Korealegal.org

This story caught my attention. I have great disdain and zero tolerance for those who neglect their children. On the positive side, Koreans focus lots on their families and children. Such negligence is a rare exception. What then stands out in this case is that  legal defense seeks to set a precedence.

The case could set an important legal precedent if it establishes that gaming addiction is a mitigating circumstance in crime.

Korean law accepts drunkenness as such on the basis that the perpetrator is not acting according to his own will. With neither defendant having psychological problems beyond game addiction, the judge may set a precedent.”

Internet Addiction Led To Baby’s Death

By Andrew Salmon for CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Couple pleads guilty to negligent homicide
  • Pair is arrested in March, accused of starving baby to death
  • Police: Couple spent hours on online game where they raised a virtual child
  • Part of couple’s defense includes addiction to Internet gaming

Suwon, South Korea (CNN) – A South Korean couple whose three-month-old daughter died of malnutrition while they were raising a virtual child in an online game pleaded guilty to negligent homicide on Friday.

Kim Jae-beom, 40, and his common-law wife, Kim Yun-jeong, 25, will be sentenced on April 16.

Prosecutors are seeking a five-year sentence for the couple, whose defense included a statement alleging gaming addiction.

The pair is expecting a second child in August. Their first daughter’s name, Kim Sa-rang, means “love” in Korean. She died in September of malnutrition while they were engaged in overnight sessions at a PC Bang, or a 24-hour Internet cafe. The couple would allegedly put her to bed and leave for 10-hour gaming sessions.

They were playing Prius Online, a 3-D fantasy game in which players raise an online girl who gains magic powers as she is nurtured and grows older.

“I think of our baby in heaven,” the father responded when asked if he had anything to say. “I will be guilty until the day I die.”

The father — a slight, gray-haired man and the mother — a visibly emotional woman — were dressed in pale green detention center uniforms. They appeared nervous and timid; neither had previous convictions. The father was a taxi and truck driver, while the mother was unemployed.

They said they met in 2008 and the father introduced Kim to online gaming. Sa-rang was born prematurely in July last year and died a few months later. At the time of death, she weighed 5.5 pounds (2.5 kgs), the court heard. She was 6.4 pounds when she was born.

“When she cried, I cuddled her, but I noticed she was getting thinner,” the mother said, adding that she had not learned about baby care at the hospital nor had she read any books on the subject.

The couple reported the baby’s death to police, who become suspicious about her low weight. They were subsequently arrested and investigated.

“They were addicted to Internet gaming; they put their baby to sleep and came home early in the morning,” said their attorney, Kim Dong-young (no relation) of the Korean Legal Aid Corp. “They regret it, but Ms. Kim is pregnant, please consider this.”

Speaking about his unborn child, the father said: “There will be no second mistake.”

Korea has arguably the world’s most advanced broadband infrastructure, a $5 billion gaming industry and an evolving culture built around gaming. Companies such as Samsung sponsor pro-teams that compete in leagues.

Given the wide availability of the Internet — there are 21,500 PC Bangs nationwide — Web addiction has been widely noted in South Korea, though questions remain on the most appropriate treatment.

How is South Korea trying to beat Internet addiction?

The case could set an important legal precedent if it establishes that gaming addiction is a mitigating circumstance in crime.

Korean law accepts drunkenness as such on the basis that the perpetrator is not acting according to his own will. With neither defendant having psychological problems beyond game addiction, the judge may set a precedent.

“Since they were addicted, the judge could make it a factor in cutting their sentence,” the lawyer said.

Even if he does, Korea is not a litigious society, the lawyer said, and the chances of businesses such as PC Bangs or game developers being sued are low.

The case has sparked interest in the gaming industry.

“I have been reading the articles,” said an employee of “Tony’s,” a PC Bang in Suwon, near the court. But, he said, the case would not have any ramifications for the industry.

The trial lasted just over half an hour in a near-empty courtroom in Suwon, a satellite city an hour south of Seoul best known as home to the factories of Samsung, a leading electronics company.

Legal Defense in Infant Death: Internet Addiction

Korea to Sign Hague Convention on Parental Child Abduction

Monday, March 8th, 2010
Korea to Sign Hague Convention on Parental Child Abduction

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org
Last year I was involved in a child custody case as an expert witness. One of the divorced parents wanted to return to Korea with her 2 children. The dad opposed such a move on a number of grounds. One key point was that Korea was not party to the Hague Convention on Child Abduction. That will change.

Chosun Ilbo notes:
Korea is to join the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in an effort to prevent a divorced parent in an international marriage from taking children to his or her native country.

The Hague Convention stipulates that if parents in international marriage get divorced, children have the right to stay in the country where they have lived. Once Korea joins, if either parent takes children to his or her native country after the divorce, the other will be able to take them back to Korea in case the country of the former spouse is also a signatory.

As international marriages increase in Korea, many disputes have arisen over who should raise children after divorce.

A government officials cited the case of a Korean woman who divorced her American husband in the U.S. and took the child to Korea, and her ex-husband presented it as an abduction.

“Conversely, if an American spouse who has lived in Korea takes his or her child to the U.S. without the former spouse’s consent after divorce, there is currently no international legal basis for the Korean spouse to bring the child back to Korea,” the official added.

Some 81 countries have signed up to the Hague Convention. The government has been pushing for a revision of relevant domestic law after completing a review last year.

Korea to Sign Hague Convention on Parental Child Abduction

Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

Thursday, February 25th, 2010
Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

By Don Southerton, Korea Legal.org Editor

AP notes….WASHINGTON – Even as Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda wrapped up a grueling appearance before Congress, the head of the world’s largest automaker wasn’t leaving his problems behind.

Toyota faces a criminal investigation by federal prosecutors in New York. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the company. Its beleaguered U.S. dealerships are facing repairs to potentially millions of customer vehicles that have been recalled. The company is offering customers new reimbursements for rental carsand other expenses.

Its lawyers are bracing for waves of death and injury lawsuits. The Senate will conduct a new hearing next week. And the cost to Toyota’s reputation is only now starting to emerge.

Toyota is taking a beating in the media and in Washington, DC before a congressional hearing. Korea, too, feels the pressure against Toyota, as a respected benchmark for Asian auto success, a desired high quality import, and a rival for Hyundai and  Kia Motors ( globally and even in Korea).  That so, some in Korea feel Toyota is a ripe target for lawsuit.

Chosun Ilbo notes

According to the Seoul Central District Court on Wednesday, a 54-year-old woman identified only as Kim has filed suit against Toyota Motor, Toyota Korea, and Toyota’s Korean dealer Hyosung for damages of W138.9 million (US$1=W1,144), including the car price and compensation. She bought a 2010 Prius Hybrid in September last year.

Kim complains of a serious problem in the car’s braking system, which made her afraid to drive. She alleges that Toyota and others have continued selling cars in the country since 2009 after deliberately covering up serious defects, delaying the improvement of the braking system until this February. Kim suffered no accident.

Her attorneys said it is likely that more buyers of the Prius will sue Toyota due to the latest recall in the U.S.

Toyota Korea Sees First Lawsuit

Everything Korean: October Vodcast Update–Korea WEST, The Korea Society, Korean Cars, and Korean Food

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009
Everything Korean: October Vodcast Update  Korea WEST, The Korea Society, Korean Cars, and Korean Food

Just posted– a new vodcast sharing an update on Bridging Culture Worldwide, the Korea WEST internship program, our new book Chemulpo to Songdo IBD: Korea’s International Gateway, Korea 2.0, a Korea Society podcast discussing the Korean car industry, and Korea Cuisine, a blog looking at classic Korean foods. Lots shared in a concise video sponsored by Bridging Culture Worldwide and Korea Business Central.

Everything Korean: October Vodcast Update  Korea WEST, The Korea Society, Korean Cars, and Korean Food