Posts Tagged ‘Don Southerton expert witness’

Happy Holidays 2011

Friday, December 23rd, 2011
Happy Holidays 2011

Happy Holidays 2011

As the holidays approach, you may wish to greet your Korean colleagues with:

Sae hae bok man i ba deu say yo! (Season’s Greetings)

(I will modify the Romanization for easier pronunciation).
Hint: Break the greeting into: sae hae bok—mah ne—bah deu say yo

In South Korea, the government recognizes Christmas December 25 as a public holiday. This year it falls on a Sunday, so most are back to work on Monday. Christians, who make up about 30% of the population, celebrate the occasion as a religious holiday.

Like in the West, both Christians and non-Christians may engage in some holiday customs such as gift-giving, sending Christmas cards, and setting up decorated trees in their homes.

What may surprise some is that public and company Christmas trees and decoration stay up way past the holiday. In fact, many stay in place to the Lunar New Year in late January.

Sae hae bok man i ba deu say yo! works well and is a common seasonal greeting.
For those wanting to wish someone Merry Christmas use Sung tan jul chuk ha.

If you have a specific question, please feel to contact me at Dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com.

Have a happy holiday season!

Sae hae bok man i ba deu say yo!

Happy Holidays 2011

KEB Lone Star TBS eFM Radio Commentary

Saturday, November 26th, 2011
KEB Lone Star TBS eFM Radio Commentary

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

KEB Lone Star continue to draw media attention. In fact, it has long been a lightning rod for controversy.

I’ll soon post an audio of  my recent TBS eFM interview on issues surrounding Lone Star and KEB.

That said, one dimension to the controversy is–Does Lone Star warrant the huge payoff? Maybe…

1) they did turn KEB into a hugely success bank.

2) if there had never been issues that tied up  KEB Lone Star  in the courts, Lone Star would have preferred  to sell their holdings in 2006 and in subsequent aborted deals. Ironically being forced to hold on the FEB, Lone Star will reap even more gains.

Comments and / or questions?

KEB Lone Star TBS eFM Radio Commentary

Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

Friday, September 23rd, 2011
Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

Another dimension to the Samsung Apple slugfest is the upcoming release of the iPhone 5 in Korea as well as the rest of the world. Samsung appears to be pressuring the courts to stall the release in their home market. We’ll see…. Apple should discuss with me on how to approach culturally. For example (APPLE), I’d appeal to popular tech lust and let Koreans demand the product…..give me a call  1-310-866-3777 anytime.

Korea Times notes

Samsung Electronics is seeking a complete ban on the sales of the upcoming Apple iPhone 5 in Korea, in apparent retaliation to its U.S. rival’s continual patent suits against it in global markets.

Sources closely involved with the thorny issue including Samsung insiders made the comments Sunday as the two technology firms’ patent war is set to spread from Europe to the rest of the world.

At least 23 lawsuits are pending between Apple and Samsung in such countries as France, Japan, Germany, Korea and the United States and more are expected in an increasing number of states.

“Just after the arrival of the iPhone 5 here, Samsung plans to take Apple to court here for its violation of Samsung’s wireless technology related patents,’’ said a senior executive from Samsung Electronics, asking not to be identified.

“For as long as Apple does not drop mobile telecommunications functions, it would be impossible for it to sell its i-branded products without using our patents. We will stick to a strong stance against Apple during the lingering legal fights.’’

His remarks contrast Samsung’s hitherto approach of not entering into a dogfight with Apple even when the latter brought up patent issues with Samsung’s Galaxy brand smartphones and tablets.

The reason Samsung swallowed the image as copycats is Apple is one of the firm’s major clients as many of the U.S. behemoth’s i-products use its flash memories.

But Samsung showed signs of changing its strategy after Apple won an injunction from a German court against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 early last month so that Korea’s foremost company cannot sell the tablet PC in Germany.

To add insult to injury, it had to pull its latest tablet version of the Galaxy Tab 7.7, which has a smaller screen than the Tab 10.1, from its unveiling event during the IFA tech fair in Berlin this month.

Samsung responded by filing an appeal against the Germany ruling and a countersuit against Apple in Australia where the sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 have also been prohibited.

And the world’s second-largest handset maker is looking to make preemptive strikes by targeting the iPhone 5.

“We are taking different tactics since we are quite confident,’’ said another Samsung executive on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t allowed to speak publicly for Samsung.

“If Samsung wins in Germany that will give us a big breakthrough and so will other envisioned efforts against such products as the iPhone 5.’’

Samsung claimed that Apple’s iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPad 2 violate seven patents related to its wireless technology.

Targeting iPhone 5

The iPhone 5 has drawn interest even before officially hitting the market thanks to its attractive features and functionality.

It uses LG Display’s liquid crystal display (LCD), Samsung’s NAND flash memories and application processors (APs) and LG Innotek’s camera modules. It is also likely to have an 8-megapixel camera and an A5 dual-core processor.

Near-field communication (NFC), a feature to make it possible for the iPhone to be waved over a sensor for credit-card payments, will be added, officials said.

If Samsung manages to suspend the latest Apple handset it could affect SK Telecom and KT, the nation’s top two mobile carriers, authorized to sell iPhones.

KT spokesman Lee In-won said that KT will pay attention to the ongoing patent battles, while SK Telecom spokeswoman Kim Ji-won made no comment.

KT and SK Telecom have sold some 2.7 million and 400,000 iPhones in the local market, respectively. The iPhone 5 will make its debut here in the not-so-distant future through the two carriers.

Yet, there are chances that the standoff between Samsung and Apple may ease as the former is reluctant to make an enemy of the latter.

Such a mantra was well felt in statements by the Korean firm’s chief executive during a recent meeting with reporters.

“Apple is Samsung’s biggest customer. Hewlett-Packard (HP), Nokia and Sony were Samsung’s previous big clients, however, Apple is now a primary one. From our perspective, we are not entirely happy (about the litigations),’’ Samsung CEO Choi Gee-sung said.

 

 

Samsung Push For Ban on iPhone 5 Korea

American Golf Retailer Golfsmith Looks to Korea

Saturday, August 27th, 2011
American Golf Retailer Golfsmith Looks to Korea

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

After months of work and meetings, I can share news that America’s top golf retailer Golfsmith has signed a MOU with GOLFZON, Korea’s leader in golf simulation technology. We work closely with both firms serving as consultants providing a wide range of services.

AUSTIN, Texas, Aug 22, 2011 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) — Golfsmith International Inc. GOLF -0.46% , the largest golf specialty retailer in the U.S., today announced it will introduce its first retail operations outside the U.S., in South Korea, the fastest growing golf market in the world. This new agreement with GOLFZON Co. (kosdaq:GOLFZON) is another step in Golfsmith’s global strategy aimed at forging partnerships around the world as the company continues to leverage its brand assets internationally. Golfsmith will reinvest the income generated from this new partnership back into its core U.S. business where the company continues to gain momentum and market share.

The Memorandum of Understanding combines Golfsmith’s international influence along with GOLFZON’s knowledge and presence in South Korea — where a majority of golf is played indoors on golf simulators. With a dominant share of over 84% of the golf simulator market, GOLFZON supplies its products to over 4000 indoor screen golf courses across South Korea. This alliance with Golfsmith will enable GOLFZON to open full retail stores with the best brands in golf like those found in Golfsmith’s stores throughout the United States.

“With three million golfers already in South Korea our agreement with GOLFZON further signals Golfsmith’s global strategy to build relationships that develop, manage and market Golfsmith and its brands,” said Golfsmith Chairman and CEO Martin Hanaka. “GOLFZON’s keen understanding of the South Korean golf market and its solid customer base make them a strong partner in one of the biggest golf markets in the world. It’s exciting to see an established brand like GOLFZON move from an interactive simulator gaming environment into a fully operational retail environment under the Golfsmith banner.”

GOLFZON’s CEO Kim Young-chan shared Hanaka’s optimism. “GOLFZON has been highly successful bringing together golf and technology in South Korea. We now look to Golfsmith’s successful retail golf model in the U.S. to bring their expertise to the South Korean golf retail industry.”

The agreement allows Golfsmith and GOLFZON to build a strong collaborative working relationship, while supporting each other in the design, marketing, and development of Korean retail golf operations. The goal will be to provide the South Korean golf enthusiast, whether a novice or highly experienced, with exceptional values along with the latest product and service offerings. Under the terms of the agreement the new stores will be branded Golfsmith and operated by GOLFZON.

About GOLFZON

Established in 2000, GOLFZON is one of the world-largest sellers of virtual golf simulation systems. In South Korea, GOLFZON is a major beneficiary of the huge popularity of indoor golf courses, owning an 84% share of the golf simulator market. With over 16,500 systems operating in 30 countries, over 200,000 people play on GOLFZON systems every day including participating in real-time tournaments with other golfers or taking swings at internationally recognized golf courses — such as those in Pebble Beach, California. For more information about GOLFZON, please visit the company’s website at http://company.GOLFZON.com/en .

About Golfsmith International Inc.

Golfsmith has been in business for over 44 years and is a specialty retailer of golf and tennis equipment, apparel and accessories. The company operates as an integrated multi-channel retailer, offering its customers the convenience of shopping in 78 stores across the United States, through its Internet site and from its assortment of catalogs. Golfsmith offers an extensive product selection that features premier branded merchandise, as well as its proprietary products, clubmaking components and pre-owned clubs. For more information about Golfsmith, please visit the company’s website at www.golfsmith.com .

American Golf Retailer Golfsmith Looks to Korea

Lone Star-KEB Deal Stalled

Friday, March 18th, 2011
Lone Star KEB Deal Stalled

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

In my previous post, I noted that although some legal issues lingered, it seemed that the Lone Star KEB deal would soon be completed. Not so it seems. In fact, things might unravel.   Korea Times paints four scenarios.

 

FSC’s ‘on-hold’ call to cause investors to raise eyebrows
By Kim Tae-gyu 

Lone Star KEB Deal StalledThe Financial Services Commission (FSC) decided to delay a decision on two key issues that stand in the way of Hana Financial Group’s acquisition of the Korea Exchange Bank (KEB) from Lone Star Funds Wednesday.
The points at hand are whether Lone Star legally became the majority stakeholder in KEB and approval for the deal itself.

The FSC’s latest decision came with the markets watching whether the Korean government had been stalling for seven years without acting on Lone Star’s legal qualifications.

It can be taken either as a case of bureaucratic ineptitude, the very tendency that ends up stunting the growth of private enterprises, or a case of public servants’ prudence. Either way, the decision could entail unexpected consequences.

There are four possible scenarios over the future of the Korea Exchange Bank (KEB) as a result of the FSC’s delayed decision.

In the worst-case scenario at least for Hana Financial, the delay may kill the deal to buy KEB for 4.7 trillion won ($4.2 billion) from Lone Star Funds, agreed on in November.

This would mark an abrupt turnaround since approval from the Financial Services Commission (FSC) has been widely expected.

Yet, things changed on March 10 when the Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s ruling over Paul Yoo or Yoo Hoi-won’s alleged false disclosure to manipulate stock prices of KEB’s credit card unit in 2003 to deflate its acquisition prices.

As a result Yoo, an erstwhile head of Lone Star’s unit here, is to face a protracted court battle.

If he is eventually found guilty, Lone Star would be not eligible as the single-largest shareholder of KEB as the relevant law stipulates an entity found guilty of a financial crime in the previous five years cannot hold a major stake in a financial company.

Obviously affected by this verdict, the FSC delayed a decision on whether Lone Star was eligible to become the biggest shareholder of KEB. It did not even discuss the approval of the Hana-Lone Star deal.

Doubts are springing up that the sale of KEB will not go ahead because both Hana Financial and Lone Star can walk away if it is not completed by May.

Market observers say the two most significant factors are the court verdict and the decision of the FSC.

The former would take time with Lone Star possibly resorting to a petition to the Constitutional Court. Accordingly, the FSC is likely to play a key role with regard to the KEB’s future.

All four scenarios center around the decisions of the FSC: Is Lone Star an eligible shareholder of KEB and will it give the green light to the Hana-Lone Star deal?

Eligible, hence ok the deal

The FSC seems to think there were no problems in Lone Star taking over KEB in 2003.

Critics have claimed that the Texan private equity fund is a non-financial company, which is not allowed to snap up banks under Korean law. But the FSC said this was not the case.

Excluding the lingering legal disputes, FSC standing commissioner Choi Jong-ku told reporters after the FSC meeting that Lone Star is allowed to own KEB.

After reviewing various legal claims, the FSC may conclude that Lone Star is eligible to own KEB. Then it will be able to approve the Hana-Lone Star contract.

Yet the FSC will have to consider that its measures might conflict with those of the courts.

Lone Star KEB Deal Stalled

Not eligible, hence scrap the deal

Should the FSC deny Lone Star’s eligibility and refuse to endorse the sale, the contract will be scrapped. This would be the worst-case scenario for Lone Star as it might have to sell off its 51-percent stakes at market prices.

Then the fund would receive in the neighborhood of 3 trillion won instead of 4.7 trillion won as agreed with Hana, the price including the so-called management right premium.

This is what the trade union contends is the right solution.

“The gist of the highest court’s ruling is that Lone Star is not eligible as the largest KEB shareholder. Subsequently, the FSC is required to follow it,’’ KEB trade union spokesman Kim Bo-heon said.

“Along the same lines, the Hana-Lone Star contract should be jettisoned. Then, Lone Star should sell the shares at market prices.’’

Not eligible, but ok the deal

If an entity is classified as ineligible as the shareholder of a bank, it has to offload its stock.

Some argue that the FSC may be able to find a solution in denying Lone Star’s eligibility while approving the KEB deal, which would still lead Lone Star to sell off its shares.

The KEB trade union has vowed to go on strike if the FSC approves the deal. It already held union ballots where 96 percent of its members voted for walkouts.

“If the eligibility of the largest shareholder is denied, it means that Lone Star is not supposed to manage KEB. So, it has to be deprived of management right premium in disposing of its shares,’’ Kim said.

“It can take only the market prices for its stocks. Otherwise, the FSC will come under criticism that it has given special treatment to Hana since its head is close to President Lee Myung-bak.’’

Hana Financial Group Chairman Kim Seung-yu is a long-time friend of President Lee. Both studied business administration together at Korea University.

No decision

The final possibility is that the FSC will not draw any conclusions on either issue. The regulator might say that it plans to wait for the final court ruling no matter how long it takes.

Then, the KEB deal is unlikely to go ahead since the chances are that both Hana and Lone Star would not wait indefinitely.

Those involved in the contract would not be happy with this scenario as conventional beliefs show that “The worst decision is not to make any decision on immediate topics.’’

But this is somewhat implausible in consideration of the FSC leadership. Its Chairman Kim Seok-dong tends not to take a wait-and-see approach when he has a significant task.

Source: Korea Times

 

 

 

 

 

Lone Star KEB Deal Stalled

Korean Class Action Suit Against Dow Corning

Saturday, February 26th, 2011
Korean Class Action Suit Against Dow Corning

By Don Southerton, KoreaLegal.org Editor

I was a little suprised that a recent ruling on a Korean class action lawsuit against Dow Corning was the first of its kind. No surprise it was breast implants, which  since 2004 U.S. courts determined Dow was liable.  Sadly, implants have long been popular in Korea, and this is a consequence.

Implant Victims Get Money 17 Years Later

Ending an epic, international legal battle, attorney Kim Yeon-ho won a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Korean customers who suffered from health problems after getting Dow Corning silicone breast implants.

Legal experts said the victory in the 17-year case was significant as it was the first time Koreans have won a class-action lawsuit against a foreign company.

Kim confirmed Wednesday that Dow Corning paid $3.9 million (4.38 billion won) total in compensation to 660 clients. Kim said the amount of compensation varied depending on severity of side effects experienced by his clients and ranged from $3,000 to $13,500.

In 1994, 2,600 Koreans and 300,000 people of other nationalities filed class-action suits against Dow Corning claiming they suffered health problems from the company’s breast implants, including autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Some of the plaintiffs claimed their implants leaked or burst.

In June 2004, a U.S. court acknowledged defects in Dow Corning’s silicone implants and ruled in favor of claimants.

The ruling forced Dow Corning to create a $2.4 billion settlement fund to compensate victims, which required them to submit documents to prove their health problems.

According to Kim, some 2,000 out of his original 2,600 Korean clients submitted documents and 660 received compensation. Kim said his other clients are expected to receive compensation in the future.

Despite the U.S. court ruling on the company’s implants, Dow Corning’s settlement standard stirred controversy after it announced it would pay claimants in Asian countries only 35 percent of the compensation that Americans received.

“I have been raising this issue about Dow Corning’s compensation policy for six years, and Korean claimants were able to get 60 percent of what U.S. claimants receive,” Kim said.

After graduating from Sungkyunkwan University School of Law in 1982 and Boston University School of Law in 1992, Kim practiced law in Korea and got interested in international legal disputes concerning Koreans.

When asked if Koreans who suffered health problems from Dow Corning’s implants but failed to join the 1994 class-action suit can still claim damages, Kim said “that’s possible.”

“The deadline for settlement is May 31, 2021,” Kim said. “Compensation could go to others if there’s money left after the company pays compensation to the original claimants.”

Source: JoongAng Ilbo

 

Korean Class Action Suit Against Dow Corning

Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

Saturday, February 19th, 2011
Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

By Don Southerton, Editor KoreaLegal.org

Tobacco lawsuits have a long history in the U.S. and West.  Smoking although more than popular in Korea has drawn attention in the wake of the country’s Well-being trend.  This recent court decision echos early efforts to bring lawsuit against Big Tobacco in the American South. The Seoul High Court ruled that there was considerable correlation between smoking and lung cancer.

Big Tobacco on the Dock

A meaningful ruling came out yesterday in a lawsuit filed by a group of smokers against Korea Tomorrow & Global (formerly Korea Tobacco & Ginseng), which manufactures and sells tobacco products. The Seoul High Court ruled that there was considerable correlation between smoking and lung cancer. It added that the plaintiffs had been smoking for a long period of time and suffered lung cancer, acknowledging the epidemiological relevance.

The ruling is the first-ever confirmation of the common knowledge that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer. The appeals court overruled a lower court’s ruling that there was no evidence that proved the plaintiffs suffered from lung cancer as a result of smoking. If the Supreme Court upholds the ruling, it may cause huge repercussions as the decision provides legal grounds for many smokers with lung cancer to file separate lawsuits against tobacco companies.

The appeals court, however, upheld the lower court’s ruling that KT&G was not liable for compensation because the plaintiffs failed to prove that KT&G was involved in illegal practices in the course of manufacturing and selling tobacco.

In other words, the court didn’t agree with the plaintiffs’ argument that the government and KT&G attempted to deceive customers by covering up the dangers of tobacco and mislead them with sales gimmicks, such as calling several tobacco brands “light” or “mild” to make them appear less harmful to the health.

The harmful effects and nicotine addiction have been proven through medical research. As a result, an avalanche of lawsuits were filed not only by individuals or groups but also by health insurance companies and governments in the United States. In 1998, a state government in the U.S. won a lawsuit against tobacco companies and landed a whopping amount of compensation – $246 billion – through a so-called Mass Settlement Agreement. The family of a smoker who died from lung cancer also won a lawsuit against Phillip Morris and received $80 million as punitive compensation.

The victory of KT&G, however, does not grant it immunity from being responsible for causing health problems. It is regrettable that KT&G refused to accept the court’s arbitration plan demanding the company establish a public foundation to alert smokers to health risks.

The central and local governments should also do their bit by increasing the bans on smoking in public places.

Source: JoongAng Daily

Korean High Court Acknowledges Correlation Between Smoking and Lung Cancer

2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

Friday, January 7th, 2011
2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

For a full text of the report CLICK HERE

2011 Trends and Expectations—A Commentary on Korean Global Business

Korea Legal.org 2011 Trends and Expectations—An Executive-level Commentary

Monday, January 3rd, 2011
Korea Legal.org 2011 Trends and Expectations—An Executive level Commentary

By Don Southerton, Editor Korea Legal.org

Annually in an executive-level commentary, I share thoughts for the upcoming year. Looking back at 2010, North Korean saber rattling took on new meaning with several overt military confrontations against South Korea. Meanwhile, South Korea’s economy saw little sign of a double dip recession, which had worried some experts going into 2010, instead we saw continued growth in Korea’s global brands. This was further strengthened by the G-20 Summit that showcased, among others, Korean technology leaders Samsung, Hyundai-Kia Motors, and LG.

Related to U.S. and South Korea relations and following an amended agreement for the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, we should soon see the treaty ratified by Congress. Advocates see the FTA boosting annual commerce between the two nations into the billions of Dollars.

Looking forward to 2011, North Korea will continue to be a concern. Issues include the Kim regime’s succession plans, threats of more border clashes, and an unchecked nuclear arms program. Hoping to address these concerns, we’ll see strong outside diplomatic and political pressure for renewed 6 Way Talks, and to quell future border confrontations. I’ll continue to monitor and share news as it unfolds. Even in a worst-case scenario, Korean global business and local economy would bounce back and move forward, especially since much manufacturing is now done overseas.

Next, building on the momentum of the past 2 years, expect Korea’s export-driven firms to push their organizations to carve out even greater market shares. Look for bold announcements and sales targets such as #1 in global sales or production vs. the older “Top 10” or “Top 5” quest. In this effort, expect top Korean firms to expand their organization through M&A. For some, this breaks from a tradition of building and growing from within vs. acquisitions.

Additionally, as I noted last year, expect more foreign firms to aggressively target South Korea as a top emerging market. In other words, with Korea performing well many global firms and brands once focused on North American or European business partnerships will now seek out Korean opportunities. This will unfold with global businesses looking to launch new product lines (and brands) in Korea, as well as leading international firms offering their services to Korea’s top companies.

For foreign businesses entering the Korean market or partnering with Korean firms, I suggest they take efforts to understand not only the culture, but also business norms and expectations. For example, your key management needs access to coaching and someone to answer their questions on topics ranging from strategy to the impact of routine management changes within their Korean partner’s organization. It’s a small upfront investment and less costly than the consequences, which can include lawsuits, local and expat employee turnover, and months of missed goals and low productivity–not to mention tensions between you and the client over expectations.

Finally, expect further growth in Green technology (wind power, solar, and eCars) and government-led initiatives like “Work Smart.” With regard to Green, most of Korea’s major Groups have boldly entered the renewable and sustainable market and plan to expand sales globally. This includes state of the art manufacturing facilities for wind turbines, solar cells, next generation batteries, and electric power trains.

In the shift to these new technologies, forward-thinking firms are moving towards a creativity-centered organizational and workplace culture. On one level, “Work smart” was introduced in Korea to address the quality of life issues raised by its traditional long working hours. According to a Samsung Economic Research Institute report, “Work smart” will spread in 2011, and has a goal to increase productivity and creativity. Work smart includes not only eliminating unnecessary busy work, but grants autonomy in choosing working hours and gives teams the “work from home” option.

To conclude, understanding the dynamics of Korea’s economy, markets, and major business groups is vital. It is critical to take into consideration Korea’s past and current trends. Culture, global influences, cyber-communication, and a 24-hour workday add to this complexity. Bridging Culture Worldwide is dedicated to providing much needed research, analysis, and critical thinking to provide you with answers and insights 24-7-365.

Korea Legal.org 2011 Trends and Expectations—An Executive level Commentary

Special Report KORUS FTA–An Auto Sector Update

Friday, December 10th, 2010
Special Report KORUS FTA  An Auto Sector Update

By Don Southerton, Editor

Since 2006, BCW has been following the KORUS FTA discussions. As strong supporters of free trade, globalization, and the Hyundai Kia Motor Group and its US operations, we have provided research, numerous updates, and insights to US and Korean leadership. We have maintained an active role in supporting the treaty and US-Korea relations along with maintaining close ties with Koreans and Americans officials and scholars highly involved in KORUS.

Last week, after months of talks, an agreement was reached ( it still needs to be ratified by the U.S.). We provide the following key points. Part 1 includes general terms of the agreement. Part 2 is related to the auto sector, with Part 3 focuses on auto parts.

Part 1.  Pending Congressional Approval

The United States and the Republic of Korea signed the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) on June 30, 2007. If approved, the Agreement would be the United States’ most commercially significant free trade agreement in more than 16 years.

The U.S. International Trade Commission estimates that the reduction of Korean tariffs and tariff-rate quotas on goods alone would add $10 billion to $12 billion to annual U.S. Gross Domestic Product and around $10 billion to annual merchandise exports to Korea.

Under the FTA, nearly 95 percent of bilateral trade in consumer and industrial products would become duty free within three years of the date the FTA enters into force, and most remaining tariffs would be eliminated within 10 years.

For agricultural products, the FTA would immediately eliminate or phase out tariffs and quotas on a broad range of products, with almost two-thirds (by value) of Korea’s agriculture imports from the United States becoming duty free upon entry into force.

For services, the FTA would provide meaningful market access commitments that extend across virtually all major service sectors, including greater and more secure access for international delivery services and the opening up of the Korean market for foreign legal consulting services.

In the area of financial services, the FTA would increase access to the Korean market and ensure greater transparency and fair treatment for U.S. suppliers of financial services.

The FTA would address non-tariff barriers in a wide range of sectors and includes strong provisions on competition policy, labor and environment, and transparency and regulatory due process.

The KORUS FTA would also provide U.S. suppliers with greater access to the Korean government procurement market. In addition to strengthening our economic partnership, the KORUS FTA would help to solidify the two countries’ long-standing geo-strategic alliance.

As the first U.S. FTA with a North Asian partner, the KORUS FTA could be a model for trade agreements for the rest of the region, and underscore the U.S. commitment to, and engagement in, the Asia-Pacific region.

The Obama Administration will seek to promptly and effectively address the issues surrounding the KORUS FTA, including concerns that have been expressed regarding automotive trade.

Part 2 Auto Sector

The following are the major aspects of the supplementary alterations on auto trade and other issues in the South Korea-U.S. free trade agreement.

1. Automotive safety standards South Korea agreed to soften its auto safety standards for U.S.-made cars. In the previous deal, there was an automatic two-year grace period before U.S. auto manufacturers had to meet any new Korean regulations related to self-certification for safety standards. 

The supplemental agreement allows for 25,000 cars per U.S. automaker – or almost four times the number allowed in the 2007 agreement — to be imported into Korea if they meet U.S. safety standards.

2. Automotive emission standards South Korea will exempt low-volume importers from its ultra low emissions vehicle (ULEV) standard that is scheduled to take effect from 2015. Under the new standard, South Korea will apply tougher efficiency criteria for vehicles, requiring vehicles to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to 140 grams per kilometer. Under the supplemental agreement, all U.S. autos will be considered compliant with new Korean environmental standards on fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions, developed since the 2007 agreement, if they achieve 119 percent of the targets in these regulations.

3. Automotive tariffs elimination Under the 2007 agreement, all tariffs on automotives would have been immediately eliminated gradually within three years after the implementation of the accord. The new agreement allows the U.S. to keep its 2.5 percent tariff on autos in place until the fifth year. At the same time, South Korea will immediately cut its tariff on U.S. auto imports in half (from 8 percent to 4 percent), and fully eliminate the tariff in the fifth year.

4. Tariffs on pick-up trucks In 2007, the U.S. agreed to phase out its 25 percent tariff on South Korean trucks in 10 years. But the new agreement allows the U.S. to maintain its tariff until the eighth year and then phase it out by the tenth year.

5. Tariffs on electric cars Under the 2007 agreement, the U.S. and South Korea would have eliminated tariffs on electric cars and plug-in hybrids by 10 years after the implementation of the accord. The new agreement calls for South Korea to immediately reduce its electric car tariffs from 8 percent to 4 percent, and both countries will then phase out their respective tariffs by the fifth year.

6. Special safeguard for automotive industry The previous agreement had no provision on safeguard measures specific to the auto industry. Under the 2010 supplemental agreement, both sides agreed to introduce safeguard measures for motor vehicles.

Part 3, Regarding Auto Parts

BCW sees no changes from the 2007 agreement, “Tariffs would be immediately reduced to zero in each country for auto parts imported from the other.” That said, there are however a few exceptions regarding tires and some plastics.  As soon, as a final agreement is ratified, BCW will provide an itemized list of those items still with tariff restrictions and a timeline for their reduction.

For additional questions, please contact Don Southerton,  dsoutherton@bridgingculture.com 1-310-866-3777

Special Report KORUS FTA  An Auto Sector Update